Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Add Reply
Lewandoski
Topic Started: Oct 21 2013, 11:22 AM (1,104 Views)
chillyheat

lying 2 urself is worst kinda lie. u think only pizzy tink u wrong on champagne footy?

who u trying 2 kid-i should repost so i earn yours & other posters approval...huh?lol. sorry 2 disappoint but chilli actually gets off from ur ridiculous derision. unlike u, chilli dont post 2 please gallery-i post wotever garbage pleases me-fine if they hate it, fine if it pleases. very content in my own lane unlike shallow bent outta shape jodb. getta grip...asking chilli to get ur approval.lol like ur gonna buy wot im selling. dat was funny!
Edited by chillyheat, Oct 22 2013, 05:06 AM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
rw_mlite2
Member Avatar

santry_gooner
Oct 21 2013, 04:59 PM
Shall we be uncouth and talk money?

Let's.

http://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/en/robert-lewandowski/leistungsdaten/spieler_38253_2012.html

Which is a little more than the surplus we had in August. However, one is led to believe that there should be sufficient income by January to take us to 40m. However, going the opposite way, if Chelsea want a new leading striker and JM fancies doing a bit of Arsenal spoilage this price would be pushed upwards significantly and possibly price us out of the conversation.
Keep in mind, however, that the values are updated on that site on a quarterly, sometimes biannual, basis. His value will drop the most between now and January just because of the looming Bosman in his back pocket. The key to getting him in Jan, however, is not his decision on whether he wants to leave then...it's whether Dortmund is still keeping pace with Bayern in the league AND whether they advanced out of the CL group stage.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
dsch15
Member Avatar

rw_mlite2
Oct 22 2013, 10:14 AM
santry_gooner
Oct 21 2013, 04:59 PM
Shall we be uncouth and talk money?

Let's.

http://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/en/robert-lewandowski/leistungsdaten/spieler_38253_2012.html

Which is a little more than the surplus we had in August. However, one is led to believe that there should be sufficient income by January to take us to 40m. However, going the opposite way, if Chelsea want a new leading striker and JM fancies doing a bit of Arsenal spoilage this price would be pushed upwards significantly and possibly price us out of the conversation.
Keep in mind, however, that the values are updated on that site on a quarterly, sometimes biannual, basis. His value will drop the most between now and January just because of the looming Bosman in his back pocket. The key to getting him in Jan, however, is not his decision on whether he wants to leave then...it's whether Dortmund is still keeping pace with Bayern in the league AND whether they advanced out of the CL group stage.
Thinking the same. Let's do our part by burying Dortmund in the CL over these next two games!
Online Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
JustOneDennisBergkamp
Member Avatar
JODB
chillyheat
Oct 22 2013, 05:05 AM
lying 2 urself is worst kinda lie. u think only pizzy tink u wrong on champagne footy?

who u trying 2 kid-i should repost so i earn yours & other posters approval...huh?lol. sorry 2 disappoint but chilli actually gets off from ur ridiculous derision. unlike u, chilli dont post 2 please gallery-i post wotever garbage pleases me-fine if they hate it, fine if it pleases. very content in my own lane unlike shallow bent outta shape jodb. getta grip...asking chilli to get ur approval.lol like ur gonna buy wot im selling. dat was funny!
Like I said, if you join him in poo pooing the idea that champagne football was on display for all the world to admire on Saturday, that will be now not one, but two petty little twats currently doing so.

"i post wotever garbage pleases me." Perhaps the most honest thing you've ever authored here.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
cruyff_turn
Member Avatar
Administrator
The idiocy that is the intense scrutinizing of a term like champagne football is only possible on this message board.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
chillyheat

cruyff_turn
Oct 22 2013, 11:03 AM
The idiocy that is the intense scrutinizing of a term like champagne football is only possible on this message board.
dat d opinion of d administrator?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Deleted User
Deleted User

JustOneDennisBergkamp
Oct 21 2013, 08:58 PM
chillyheat
Oct 21 2013, 08:21 PM
JustOneDennisBergkamp
Oct 21 2013, 12:40 PM
chillyheat
Oct 21 2013, 11:48 AM
he big name, we big club...we spend big, we land him. we need big negotiator at emirates, chilli dont trust dat front line corporate fuck face 2 close deal. important 4 world 2 c intent & ambition and ozil aint one off scam to placate gullible sheep...er, dat would b me. lol. board need to make it up to afc & fans 4 diabolical 8 yrs of shambolic shame.

on another note, grapevine talking like flam gonna sit 2moro game out coz of head trauma?
"Shambolic shame?" My Giants didn't win a title for the first 45 years that I supported them, and my Warriors haven't won one since 1975. Each team has had some real dark years, but never have I felt any shame in rocking their colors.

Your use of the word "diabolical" goes to the heart of Bergkamp's remarks on the other thread. He rejects the notion that the club lacks ambition, and so do I. The idea that the club has been putting profit well before on-field success is a simple one, far simpler than considering the numerous factors that led to eight trophyless seasons.

If you wish to win the hearts and minds of the masses, you need to submit some evidence, or at least some plausible logic, for your criticism of Wenger and the club over the last eight years. Absent that, your point of view is as simply dismissed as it is offered.
chilli having fun posting-chilli aint trying 2 change view point of d masses. where u get dat from? dismissing my view point like others dismissed ur champagne footy huh? u make me laugh.
How about if I rephrase it? If you don't wish to meet with ridicule and derision from me and others when you post your view of the last eight seasons at The Arsenal, you may wish to point to some specifics to make your case. Pizzy may be a total PIA, but at least he attempts to make his case by analyzing specific situations. Your broad stroked characterizations are silly by comparison, and that's saying a lot.

The only person who continues to dismiss my observation about champagne footy on display Saturday is The Piz. If you join him in disagreement, that will cinch my certitude regarding the matter.
actually santry and several others dismissed your 'champagne' rubbish
Quote Post Goto Top
 
JustOneDennisBergkamp
Member Avatar
JODB
dream_team
Oct 22 2013, 03:49 PM
JustOneDennisBergkamp
Oct 21 2013, 08:58 PM
chillyheat
Oct 21 2013, 08:21 PM
JustOneDennisBergkamp
Oct 21 2013, 12:40 PM
chillyheat
Oct 21 2013, 11:48 AM
he big name, we big club...we spend big, we land him. we need big negotiator at emirates, chilli dont trust dat front line corporate fuck face 2 close deal. important 4 world 2 c intent & ambition and ozil aint one off scam to placate gullible sheep...er, dat would b me. lol. board need to make it up to afc & fans 4 diabolical 8 yrs of shambolic shame.

on another note, grapevine talking like flam gonna sit 2moro game out coz of head trauma?
"Shambolic shame?" My Giants didn't win a title for the first 45 years that I supported them, and my Warriors haven't won one since 1975. Each team has had some real dark years, but never have I felt any shame in rocking their colors.

Your use of the word "diabolical" goes to the heart of Bergkamp's remarks on the other thread. He rejects the notion that the club lacks ambition, and so do I. The idea that the club has been putting profit well before on-field success is a simple one, far simpler than considering the numerous factors that led to eight trophyless seasons.

If you wish to win the hearts and minds of the masses, you need to submit some evidence, or at least some plausible logic, for your criticism of Wenger and the club over the last eight years. Absent that, your point of view is as simply dismissed as it is offered.
chilli having fun posting-chilli aint trying 2 change view point of d masses. where u get dat from? dismissing my view point like others dismissed ur champagne footy huh? u make me laugh.
How about if I rephrase it? If you don't wish to meet with ridicule and derision from me and others when you post your view of the last eight seasons at The Arsenal, you may wish to point to some specifics to make your case. Pizzy may be a total PIA, but at least he attempts to make his case by analyzing specific situations. Your broad stroked characterizations are silly by comparison, and that's saying a lot.

The only person who continues to dismiss my observation about champagne footy on display Saturday is The Piz. If you join him in disagreement, that will cinch my certitude regarding the matter.
actually santry and several others dismissed your 'champagne' rubbish
"Continues to." Only you and chilly by my count, and you're still a petty little fuck.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Deleted User
Deleted User

cruyff_turn
Oct 22 2013, 11:03 AM
The idiocy that is the intense scrutinizing of a term like champagne football is only possible on this message board.
ok, I get it on a message board we have no right to criticize or scrutinize any comments, let's just accept them as they come!
Quote Post Goto Top
 
Deleted User
Deleted User

JustOneDennisBergkamp
Oct 22 2013, 03:51 PM
dream_team
Oct 22 2013, 03:49 PM
JustOneDennisBergkamp
Oct 21 2013, 08:58 PM
chillyheat
Oct 21 2013, 08:21 PM
JustOneDennisBergkamp
Oct 21 2013, 12:40 PM
chillyheat
Oct 21 2013, 11:48 AM
he big name, we big club...we spend big, we land him. we need big negotiator at emirates, chilli dont trust dat front line corporate fuck face 2 close deal. important 4 world 2 c intent & ambition and ozil aint one off scam to placate gullible sheep...er, dat would b me. lol. board need to make it up to afc & fans 4 diabolical 8 yrs of shambolic shame.

on another note, grapevine talking like flam gonna sit 2moro game out coz of head trauma?
"Shambolic shame?" My Giants didn't win a title for the first 45 years that I supported them, and my Warriors haven't won one since 1975. Each team has had some real dark years, but never have I felt any shame in rocking their colors.

Your use of the word "diabolical" goes to the heart of Bergkamp's remarks on the other thread. He rejects the notion that the club lacks ambition, and so do I. The idea that the club has been putting profit well before on-field success is a simple one, far simpler than considering the numerous factors that led to eight trophyless seasons.

If you wish to win the hearts and minds of the masses, you need to submit some evidence, or at least some plausible logic, for your criticism of Wenger and the club over the last eight years. Absent that, your point of view is as simply dismissed as it is offered.
chilli having fun posting-chilli aint trying 2 change view point of d masses. where u get dat from? dismissing my view point like others dismissed ur champagne footy huh? u make me laugh.
How about if I rephrase it? If you don't wish to meet with ridicule and derision from me and others when you post your view of the last eight seasons at The Arsenal, you may wish to point to some specifics to make your case. Pizzy may be a total PIA, but at least he attempts to make his case by analyzing specific situations. Your broad stroked characterizations are silly by comparison, and that's saying a lot.

The only person who continues to dismiss my observation about champagne footy on display Saturday is The Piz. If you join him in disagreement, that will cinch my certitude regarding the matter.
actually santry and several others dismissed your 'champagne' rubbish
"Continues to." Only you and chilly by my count, and you're still a petty little fuck.
and you are a wanker!
Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
ZetaBoards - Free Forum Hosting
Create your own social network with a free forum.
Learn More · Register Now
Go to Next Page
« Previous Topic · General Discussion · Next Topic »
Add Reply