| Welcome to the DragonVale Wiki Forum. If you wish to return to the wiki, please click here. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you are a new user, please register here. REGISTER LINK WORKS NOW, SORRY. )x If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| Double Rainbow Dragon; 4 distinct elements | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Jun 4 2013, 11:26 AM (12,990 Views) | |
| Suncrusher | Jun 4 2013, 11:26 AM Post #1 |
![]()
|
Edited by Sylvandyr, Jun 21 2013, 02:44 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| Replies: | |
|---|---|
| Hyped | Jun 15 2013, 11:15 AM Post #121 |
|
Hit my first double rainbow...took me approximately 70 tries with Love/Salamander on the EBS and the EBC concurrently. Used up about 325 gems... Now working on the bearded dragon while DR breeds...60 hours is a long time! |
![]() |
|
| Womantrarae | Jun 15 2013, 11:21 AM Post #122 |
|
Congrats! |
![]() |
|
| Chantal roussel | Jun 15 2013, 11:52 AM Post #123 |
|
Just got a double rainbow with breeding current (level 20 or 15, not sure which one) with love (level 15). It took me exactly 73 attempts to get it. All the fails were short time breeding: between 48 min. and 9 hours. Except on my 72nd attempt: rainbow for 38 hours. My first DR will be displayed in 2 days. . |
![]() |
|
| Fletch_smf | Jun 15 2013, 04:22 PM Post #124 |
|
The good thing about your two Solstice tests, is that the first also gives a chance for Dodo, and opposites are another thing we need to test for regarding Level advantage. In GN I'm just running lots of 100 and adding them to the data. |
![]() |
|
| Fletch_smf | Jun 15 2013, 05:42 PM Post #125 |
|
1/4 of a percent in something that has a 1 percent chance could be significant, but because Rainbow numbers are roughly the same, I'm more inclined to put it down to sample size. It seems unlikely to me that Doctors would get an advantage but not Rainbows. Or Seasonals for that matter. |
![]() |
|
| Bufkey | Jun 17 2013, 11:52 AM Post #126 |
|
Just bred a DR last weekend using the combo Love(lvl18)+Salamander(lvl15). Still don't know if this combo has a higher chance, but I didn't expect to get it after about 50 tries in both island and cave. Will keep using the same combo for second, and also DR+Celtic once the first DR hatches. |
![]() |
|
| PixieWA | Jun 17 2013, 01:48 PM Post #127 |
|
I'm at 56 breeds with Love+Salamander and no luck yet. Hope you success means mine is right around the corner.
|
|
Level Testing Spreadsheet | |
![]() |
|
| Suncrusher | Jun 18 2013, 06:36 AM Post #128 |
![]()
|
We need to hire a statistician to tell us which results are significant. ANOVA, anyone? |
![]() |
|
| Sylvandyr | Jun 18 2013, 09:57 AM Post #129 |
|
A statistician can make whichever results he wants significant Sorry to those of this profession out there, but I firmly believe that statistics is math voodoo.Hats off to all the testing. Gathering enough data for such rare dragons is a huge pain, especially since we haven't confirmed which dragon is in which tier to interfere with which probabilities. I wouldn't have the patience >_< Out of curiousity, what is our current tally? Edited by Sylvandyr, Jun 18 2013, 09:57 AM.
|
![]() |
|
| PixieWA | Jun 18 2013, 10:26 AM Post #130 |
|
Current tally is here - https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AktNIkT9lzSpdGpKcmJTeXVUenhpS3BNR0haUVl3akE&usp=sharing We are continuing testing discussion over in Fletch's breeding thread. With my luck they will make little changes here and there just to mess with us.
|
|
Level Testing Spreadsheet | |
![]() |
|
| Womantrarae | Jun 18 2013, 01:40 PM Post #131 |
|
@Pixie: you mean BFS Wizards? I sometimes wonder if we reveal what we think we've learned, will our strategies be subverted in the next upgrade? Well, let 'em! We'll figure that out, too! ![]() |
![]() |
|
| steelbluefire | Jun 18 2013, 01:53 PM Post #132 |
|
I too have gotten a double rainbow with the salamander love combo (level 18 s, 17 l). Been trying for roughly 5 days and spend up a few times. Still, it was a lot easier with this combo than Wbangca's suggestion-which I had been trying since he suggested it, with no avail. |
|
Game center ID: sethrocks21 Currently sharing: level 15 twin Thunder, hoping for twin pyrite or lapis The more twins, the better! Check out my tumblr: pokesplicing24 | |
![]() |
|
| essiw | Jun 18 2013, 03:33 PM Post #133 |
|
I could do one-way ANOVA in SPSS, though I don't know how to insert the information to be meaningful... @sylv, true, that is why you normally make hypothesises before testing you only test those hypothesises. Also you need to consider what "significant" is, one person can find a 20% significant and an other will find a chance less than 0,01% significant.
Edited by essiw, Jun 18 2013, 03:35 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| PixieWA | Jun 18 2013, 04:38 PM Post #134 |
|
Erm....are you saying I'm wasting my time and tapping? @ Womantrarae - Yep, have all the faith in the world BFS could make changes that would make all the testing moot. |
|
Level Testing Spreadsheet | |
![]() |
|
| azurile13 | Jun 18 2013, 09:13 PM Post #135 |
|
Lol, it actually is true that a statistician can "make whichever results he wants significant" but not because statistics is math voodoo Simply because you need to choose a level of confidence. How sure do you want to be? 90%? 95%? 99%?
|
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · General · Next Topic » |
| Track Topic · E-mail Topic |
8:41 AM Jul 11
|
Theme by Rae of the ZetaBoardsThemeZone.






Sorry to those of this profession out there, but I firmly believe that statistics is math voodoo.
8:41 AM Jul 11