| Ancestral component bars (Structure, Admixture, etc.) | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Mar 21 2012, 03:15 AM (858 Views) | |
| Master | Mar 21 2012, 03:55 AM Post #21 |
![]()
Administrator
|
Inference South-North admixture Seldin et al.,
|
![]() |
|
| Master | Mar 21 2012, 03:56 AM Post #22 |
![]()
Administrator
|
Geographical Affinities of the HapMap Samples Miao He et al. 2009 ![]() |
![]() |
|
| Master | Mar 21 2012, 03:57 AM Post #23 |
![]()
Administrator
|
DNA TRIBES UPGRADE 2012 dnatribes.com ![]() Edited by Master, Mar 21 2012, 03:58 AM.
|
![]() |
|
| Master | Mar 21 2012, 05:12 PM Post #24 |
![]()
Administrator
|
Rasmussen et al. 2010 Study: http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v463/n7282/abs/nature08835.html
|
![]() |
|
| Master | Apr 6 2012, 03:13 AM Post #25 |
![]()
Administrator
|
Eurogenes HGvsF Admixture test : Key: Red = South Asian hunter gatherer (native to South Asia - samples used included selected South Indians), Orange = Anatolian farmer (North Levant and Caucasus - selected Georgians and Abkhasians), Yellow = Middle Eastern herder (Southern Levant and Arabian peninsula - selected Saudi Arabians, Bedouins and Yemeni Jews), Light Green = American hunter gatherer (South and Central America - selected South and Central American Indians), Green = North Eurasian hunter gatherer (Siberia - selected Dolgans, Evenks, Koryaks, Nganassans, Yakuts and Yukagirs) Aqua Green = Baltic hunter gatherer (North & East European Plain - selected Lithuanians, Belorussians and Ukrainians), Light Blue = Oceanian hunter gatherer (Oceania and Southeast Asia - selected Papuans and Malenesians), Blue = Mediterranean farmer (Southern Europe, North Africa and Western Levant – selected Sardinians), Dark Purple = Far Eastern farmer (East Asia- selected Chinese samples), Light Purple = Bantu farmer (West and Central Africa – selected Yoruba), Pink = Pygmy hunter gatherer (West and South Africa – selected Pygmy and San). Please note: First of all, it's important to understand that this is a supervised test, using small numbers of reference individuals. Therefore, it's going to be more "noisy" than an unsupervised run using genotype data from thousands of samples. It really shouldn't be shocking to see unusual admixtures of as much as 1%, or perhaps even a little more than that.
|
![]() |
|
| Master | Apr 15 2012, 04:06 AM Post #26 |
![]()
Administrator
|
Xing et al. 2010 :
|
![]() |
|
| Master | Apr 17 2012, 12:11 AM Post #27 |
![]()
Administrator
|
Rasmussen et al. 2011 http://www.sciencemag.org/content/suppl/2011/09/21/science.1211177.DC1/Rasmussen.SOM.pdf
|
![]() |
|
| Master | Apr 20 2012, 07:20 PM Post #28 |
![]()
Administrator
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
![]() |
|
| Master | Jun 6 2013, 03:45 PM Post #29 |
![]()
Administrator
|
Moreno-Estrada et al. 2013 --> http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1306/1306.0558.pdf
|
![]() |
|
| Master | Jan 9 2014, 04:52 PM Post #30 |
![]()
Administrator
|
Lazaridis et al. :
|
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · Autosomal DNA · Next Topic » |















8:41 AM Jul 11