Intro |
|
Sad things happened to this board and this community has moved to the new place. If you lost touch with us, please find us at www.sogayshidae.com. First 10 pages of the new Forum Discussions thread should fill you in with the details of this drama. This forum was restored and frozen for archive purposes. |
| Complaints | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Feb 19 2013, 11:21 PM (41,086 Views) | |
| Abc | May 2 2013, 05:14 AM Post #561 |
![]()
The real cat lady.
|
Done. |
![]() |
|
| Guest | May 2 2013, 05:17 AM Post #562 |
|
Unregistered
|
thanks abc! <3 |
|
|
| Guest | May 2 2013, 05:46 AM Post #563 |
|
Unregistered
|
just read over the revised rules and wanted to point out some places i feel need more clarification
?????? is it just me or do these two rules contradict each other completely? especially when leaving the term "wank" completely undefined. if you specify that the userbase is free to decide what is "wank" according to the democratic three complaints rule, i guess that would be ok, but i think you should make it more clear in the rules |
|
|
| Abc | May 2 2013, 05:54 AM Post #564 |
![]()
The real cat lady.
|
Defining wank can be a bit tricky lol. Let's say... blatant hostility towards each other that goes on and on and on and on? and ppl constantly complaining about it? In that sense, it is rather obvious to spot wank going on. |
![]() |
|
| Ihla | May 2 2013, 05:59 AM Post #565 |
![]()
I need insoles
|
Bad wording in our part... It made sense in Spanish. ![]() We'll fix it ASAP. |
![]() |
|
| Guest | May 2 2013, 03:37 PM Post #566 |
|
Unregistered
|
After I pointed out that rumors with pictures should be allowed according to their new rules, this is what Frost kindly informed me: "There's no confirmation of it yet. Those pictures don't prove they're dating." So we are only allowed to discuss their straight rumor if we have their sextapes with their boyfriends? Does the rule really make sense if you can interpret everything in your way? How is this place any different from TLC? Are we still pretending everyone of them is gay all day every day? Why is straight rumors (legit ones) banned? Because |
|
|
| Abc | May 2 2013, 04:08 PM Post #567 |
![]()
The real cat lady.
|
We're taking care of that anon, making a poll for it! |
![]() |
|
| babycakes | May 2 2013, 04:15 PM Post #568 |
|
Hey guys, I just want to preface this complaint by thanking you guys for the great job you've done so far in keeping this forum from going to complete shit, it's often a thankless job but I think you've done swell thus far - especially considering how responsibility was thrust upon you by the original mods. However, I wanted to ~complain about the lack of transparency in your recent decision to ban "straight" talk. I admit being guilty of foregoing the guidelines when I joined this forum so I have no idea whether that was one of the original rules (that everyone decided to ignore) or a new one. Either way, I think it would have been better received if you had made known to forum users that you planned on enforcing it and perhaps asked their opinion on the matter, which, as far as I know, only happened with the separate shipping threads issue. While I understand and respect your motivation for banning straight talk/keeping this an all-gay forum, I feel that it should be allowed where it does not constitute straight shipping (0mfGz diZ 0ppAr iz HAWt xxs0shi sHuD geT 0n DAt diZK0stiK1!). Of course no reasonable lesbian will want to discuss any heterosexual relationship at length but I don't see anything wrong with acknowledging that the rumour(s) and/or potential bfs exist. It might be plausible to encourage forum members to spoiler their het relationship speculations so as not to ~offend anybody? Thank you for your time. |
![]() |
|
| Guest | May 2 2013, 04:15 PM Post #569 |
|
Unregistered
|
I don't like the association people make with the word delusional, like all gay things discussed in a gay thread are delusional and the straight rumours are more legit and not delusional. |
|
|
| Frost | May 2 2013, 04:18 PM Post #570 |
![]()
Stand by Mode.
|
Ok! Simple poll! Do you want to be able to discuss straight rumors (like the Hyo one) or not? VOTE! |
![]() |
|
| Abc | May 2 2013, 04:23 PM Post #571 |
![]()
The real cat lady.
|
babycakes, that's why we're making a poll right now
|
![]() |
|
| Guest | May 5 2013, 06:10 AM Post #572 |
|
Unregistered
|
Don't censor anything. Just stay in your lane. Porn and gore. |
|
|
| Ihla | May 5 2013, 06:32 AM Post #573 |
![]()
I need insoles
|
That wasn't censoring, I was just poiting out that the SYJ posts belonged to the Kpop thread. |
![]() |
|
| Guest | May 5 2013, 07:29 AM Post #574 |
|
Unregistered
|
I don't care about multiple quotes because meh but aren't huge pics normally spoilered especially when it's many of them in the same post? Two posts on page 1399 are kinda ridiculous in length. If you people quote those without spoilering the page will be hard to actually scroll and see new content. |
|
|
| Guest | May 5 2013, 07:31 AM Post #575 |
|
Unregistered
|
Yeah, this is kind of ridiculous? http://w11.zetaboards.com/sogayshidae/single/?p=8365704&t=8561834 http://w11.zetaboards.com/sogayshidae/single/?p=8365707&t=8561834 |
|
|
| Guest | May 5 2013, 07:35 AM Post #576 |
|
Unregistered
|
http://w11.zetaboards.com/sogayshidae/single/?p=8365712&t=8561834 :grim: Now that makes it hard for anyone to scroll. sa |
|
|
| Ihla | May 5 2013, 07:42 AM Post #577 |
![]()
I need insoles
|
Reminded the anons to spoil or remove tags, and edited the posts with the images.
Edited by Ihla, May 5 2013, 07:42 AM.
|
![]() |
|
| Guest | May 5 2013, 07:47 AM Post #578 |
|
Unregistered
|
Thank you for the speedy work. Spoiler: click to toggle
|
|
|
| Guest | May 6 2013, 01:46 AM Post #579 |
|
Unregistered
|
Multiple big gifs, spoilering? Y/Y? Before it happens like yesterday with the huge Yulsic pics which no one thought to spoiler before quoting...http://w11.zetaboards.com/sogayshidae/single/?p=8366595&t=8561834 |
|
|
| Guest | May 7 2013, 08:14 PM Post #580 |
|
Unregistered
|
page 1450.... maybe tell those anons to calm their tits? they keep going back and forth now and their stupid little fight is ot at best and will probably end up derailing the thread. i'm for self regulation but that is for adults and these sound like children, mods are also here to keep the thread on track. please and thank you. :bigeyes: |
|
|
| Abc | May 8 2013, 05:20 PM Post #581 |
![]()
The real cat lady.
|
I'll check it out! ![]() Seems I'm rather late lol
Edited by Abc, May 8 2013, 05:20 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| Frost | May 8 2013, 05:58 PM Post #582 |
![]()
Stand by Mode.
|
Gorl, go study. |
![]() |
|
| Guest | May 9 2013, 08:54 AM Post #583 |
|
Unregistered
|
the same yoonsic gifs have been quoted over and over again for like two days now, and it's still going on |
|
|
| Guest | May 9 2013, 10:27 AM Post #584 |
|
Unregistered
|
What was the point of editing the image tag here? http://w11.zetaboards.com/sogayshidae/single/?p=8371068&t=8561834 Abc mentioned 4-5 quotes, this was once and the image is not big or a gif. Don't go crazy editing images when it's not needed. |
|
|
| Frost | May 9 2013, 10:31 AM Post #585 |
![]()
Stand by Mode.
|
I'm so tired of this quoting pics issue... There, the pic is back. |
![]() |
|
| Guest | May 9 2013, 10:36 AM Post #586 |
|
Unregistered
|
it isn't the photos its the gifs that have been posted so many times for literately two days straight now lol thats way more than 4-5 times not once has the img tag been taken out by the anons quoting |
|
|
| Frost | May 9 2013, 10:38 AM Post #587 |
![]()
Stand by Mode.
|
I've edited several of those I think. |
![]() |
|
| Guest | May 9 2013, 10:41 AM Post #588 |
|
Unregistered
|
Probably cause they are under spoilers no one sees that. |
|
|
| Artichoke | May 9 2013, 01:13 PM Post #589 |
|
nam fuit ante Helenam cunnus taeterrima belli causa
|
I don't understand why it's a big deal that it was removed, tbh.
|
![]() |
|
| Guest | May 9 2013, 01:35 PM Post #590 |
|
Unregistered
|
I don't know about others but I dislike posts being edited when there's no reason to edit them, it stinks of over moderation and I don't like it. Editing this post: http://w11.zetaboards.com/sogayshidae/single/?p=8371068&t=8561834 to take out the image tags when its just one stupid quote was downright unintelligent. The fact that the only edited posts had Yoonsic images like this http://w11.zetaboards.com/sogayshidae/single/?p=8371130&t=8561834 or this http://w11.zetaboards.com/sogayshidae/single/?p=8371028&t=8561834 is one huge WTF, that's not even what that other anon was bitching about. If you are going to remove img quotes after 1 quote, the first quote, then JFC do it for all posts then or declare a ban on images and be done with it. There was no quoting pics issue, things were going quite well on that front the last few days and there was no reason to have one now, some of those edits were mistakes, period. |
|
|
| Artichoke | May 9 2013, 02:52 PM Post #591 |
|
nam fuit ante Helenam cunnus taeterrima belli causa
|
Fair enough, actually. I just really can't comprehend the logic behind not removing the [img][/img] tags, as if it's some Herculean task that you've been asked to do, instead of just common courtesy to stop the thread looking cluttered and disorganised. But, haha, that's mainly my personal preference, so. |
![]() |
|
| Guest | May 9 2013, 03:16 PM Post #592 |
|
Unregistered
|
It's not the task is Herculean, it's the task is stupid to expect anyone to do after just one quote which was my gripe in the cases I showed above. If some like doing so then go right ahead but to act like one quote is such a big deal that removing the image tags is a courtesy I simply do not comprehend. Multiple quotes I can understand because babies complain about seeing the same crap over and over again but one quote is just 'WTF are you doing?' when editing posts. Some I guess like links everywhere instead of images, others like images not links but unless we are dealing with multiple quotes in the same line (a quote of a quote of a quote ~) then just leave posts alone unless its a HUGE GIF that is completely ridiculous to leave unspoilered because takes such a large area, the Godzilla of gifs. [marq=right] GOGIRA! GOGIRA! [/marq] ![]() OK I'm gonna stop before I start geeking out on Godzilla.
|
|
|
| Frost | May 9 2013, 04:09 PM Post #593 |
![]()
Stand by Mode.
|
I edited more than Yoonsic posts. Whatever, the Img rule is a rule we're going to discus very soon. |
![]() |
|
| Artichoke | May 9 2013, 05:16 PM Post #594 |
|
nam fuit ante Helenam cunnus taeterrima belli causa
|
Well, imo, one quote is enough. I never quote images because you can just easily click the link if you want to see it and it makes the thread look a lot cleaner, along with quote box inside quote box inside quote box... It just frustrates me 'cause it looks so messy. I can see why editing the tags out would be an issue, though. |
![]() |
|
| Guest | May 10 2013, 02:07 AM Post #595 |
|
Unregistered
|
Seriously, what is the point of editing these posts? http://w11.zetaboards.com/sogayshidae/single/?p=8371845&t=8561834 http://w11.zetaboards.com/sogayshidae/single/?p=8371862&t=8561834 You can't even quote images once now? What is this? Abc said 4-5 quotes but Radster is now editing things like she feels like I mean wtf seriously, wtf? She isn't even a mod. We can't even see Taeyeon one more time? |
|
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · General Discussion · Next Topic » |










Before it happens like yesterday with the huge Yulsic pics which no one thought to spoiler before quoting...


9:15 PM Jul 11