Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]

Intro


Attention:

Sad things happened to this board and this community has moved to the new place. If you lost touch with us, please find us at www.sogayshidae.com.
First 10 pages of the new Forum Discussions thread should fill you in with the details of this drama.

This forum was restored and frozen for archive purposes.

Add Reply
Complaints
Topic Started: Feb 19 2013, 11:21 PM (41,059 Views)
Artichoke
Member Avatar
nam fuit ante Helenam cunnus taeterrima belli causa
Guest
Oct 2 2013, 01:33 AM
Might be nothing but both edits leave out Seo from the group and are posted with  :teehee: like its funny she's not there? But frankly it reminds me of those anti that believe in SND8 because they hate one member and don't think they deserve to be in the group.

Might be nothing but its not normal in a fan forum to purposely edit out a member like that over and over. Like I said, just it weird now. :nails: Might be someone to watch, if its the same person or similar posts keep appearing you'd have to wonder what's the purpose. IDK.
Username is "Anti", too. I think it's pretty weird as well.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
orangedaffodils
Member Avatar
Let ε <0
Yeah it's p strange.

Like ihlita said, we'll keep an eye on them.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Guest
Unregistered

Artichoke
Oct 2 2013, 01:42 AM
Anon
Oct 2 2013, 01:33 AM
Might be nothing but both edits leave out Seo from the group and are posted with  :teehee: like its funny she's not there? But frankly it reminds me of those anti that believe in SND8 because they hate one member and don't think they deserve to be in the group.

Might be nothing but its not normal in a fan forum to purposely edit out a member like that over and over. Like I said, just it weird now. :nails: Might be someone to watch, if its the same person or similar posts keep appearing you'd have to wonder what's the purpose. IDK.
Username is "Anti", too. I think it's pretty weird as well.
That was my first thought as well besides the manip itself, AntiSoecial!Anon, it says Soe but that could be a typo and she meant Seo or its to throw people off from making an instant connection.
Quote Post Goto Top
 
orangedaffodils
Member Avatar
Let ε <0
Suspicions were confirmed: that person is indeed a troll. They brought the manips back up asking, "where's seobb?" as if they were a da.

It's being taken care of right now. Thanks for linking the manip posts here :thumbsup:
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Guest
Unregistered

Now that its been established its a troll can you now deal with that fucker already? It should've been obvious it was a fucking troll and not some "harmless manip".

And by the way, there's a big fucking difference to not being a fan of one of the girl's/not liking or caring for them and being an anti, and this was a clear anti.

An anti who took ya'll for fools, they must be laughing at their posts being seem as harmless and no one (but me) raising the alarm. They got you all good. How the fuck does that happen? Do trolls really need to be more obvious now for them to be dealt with?

My humble opinion but you defo dropped the ball this time.
Quote Post Goto Top
 
Guest
Unregistered

Hmm when I posted ODs post wasn't up, I still stand by my humble opinion but I guess late is better than never.
Quote Post Goto Top
 
Guest
Unregistered

Guest
Oct 2 2013, 05:02 AM
Now that its been established its a troll can you now deal with that fucker already? It should've been obvious it was a fucking troll and not some "harmless manip".

And by the way, there's a big fucking difference to not being a fan of one of the girl's/not liking or caring for them and being an anti, and this was a clear anti.

An anti who took ya'll for fools, they must be laughing at their posts being seem as harmless and no one (but me) raising the alarm. They got you all good. How the fuck does that happen? Do trolls really need to be more obvious now for them to be dealt with?

My humble opinion but you defo dropped the ball this time.
You're giving the troll too much attention
It wasn't a big deal (and I'm a seohyun stan)I hope the mods ban him/her, I don't know how the ban works hopefully trolls get banned asap
Quote Post Goto Top
 
Guest
Unregistered

Guest
Oct 2 2013, 01:56 PM
Anon
Oct 2 2013, 05:02 AM
Now that its been established its a troll can you now deal with that fucker already? It should've been obvious it was a fucking troll and not some "harmless manip".

And by the way, there's a big fucking difference to not being a fan of one of the girl's/not liking or caring for them and being an anti, and this was a clear anti.

An anti who took ya'll for fools, they must be laughing at their posts being seem as harmless and no one (but me) raising the alarm. They got you all good. How the fuck does that happen? Do trolls really need to be more obvious now for them to be dealt with?

My humble opinion but you defo dropped the ball this time.
You're giving the troll too much attention
It wasn't a big deal (and I'm a seohyun stan)I hope the mods ban him/her, I don't know how the ban works hopefully trolls get banned asap
I'm not giving the troll too much attention, I'm giving initial inaction by mods attention. Doesn't matter if the a troll's efforts don't cause their intended purpose, normally wank, you should be aware and deal with it. Anti posts belong in this forum as much as Isabella's or peen trolls do. In case you haven't noticed, this is the complaints thread, I wasn't crying about the damn posts in the SNSD thread, they didn't affect me; the pieces of shit just don't belong in the forum and the posts having been thought as harmless initially was a warning sign to me. If you don't give a fuck then don't give a fuck but don't tell others not to care, giving the troll attention would've quoting their post like a dumb ass not noticing what they were. :nails:
Quote Post Goto Top
 
Guest
Unregistered

^ I just found your omg they're all laughing, you all are fools, innecesary attention, when the thread didn't really feed the troll, the thread is pretty much dead these days.

and calm down.
Quote Post Goto Top
 
Guest
Unregistered

Guest
Oct 2 2013, 03:55 PM
^ I just found your omg they're all laughing, you all are fools, innecesary attention, when the thread didn't really feed the troll, the thread is pretty much dead these days.

and calm down.
I am calm.
But if I was uncalm I have all the right to be uncalm ^_^ no one is making you or anyone else read my posts here.¯\_(ツ)_/¯


The thread did feed the troll by quoting their posts, the posts that were deleted where the troll quoting themselves so people fell for their  :teehee: :seo: .
Quote Post Goto Top
 
Guest
Unregistered

Guest
Oct 2 2013, 04:04 PM
Anon
Oct 2 2013, 03:55 PM
^ I just found your omg they're all laughing, you all are fools, innecesary attention, when the thread didn't really feed the troll, the thread is pretty much dead these days.

and calm down.
I am calm.
But if I was uncalm I have all the right to be uncalm ^_^ no one is making you or anyone else read my posts here.¯\_(ツ)_/¯


The thread did feed the troll by quoting their posts, the posts that were deleted where the troll quoting themselves so people fell for their  :teehee: :seo: .
hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm I've seen this behaviour before :nails:
*abandon thread*
Quote Post Goto Top
 
Artichoke
Member Avatar
nam fuit ante Helenam cunnus taeterrima belli causa
It was a pretty obvious troll...
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Guest
Unregistered

is this the same seobb anti/troll?
http://sogayshidae.com/single/?p=8600965&t=9140814
Quote Post Goto Top
 
Ihla
Member Avatar
I need insoles
Anon
Oct 7 2013, 11:18 AM
is this the same seobb anti/troll?
http://sogayshidae.com/single/?p=8600965&t=9140814
The ip addresses are different and it's not a proxy either, but I'll be trashing the posts.

ETA:
It just posted again, so yup, a troll. Banned it.
Edited by Ihla, Oct 7 2013, 11:35 AM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Guest
Unregistered

There's been an Isabella troll posting since about page 236 and this would be their latest post:


http://w11.zetaboards.com/sogayshidae/single/?p=8601237&t=9140814

Could be more than one IDK just please investigate and ban.
Quote Post Goto Top
 
Guest
Unregistered

Guest
Oct 7 2013, 03:53 PM
There's been an Isabella troll posting since about page 236 and this would be their latest post:


http://w11.zetaboards.com/sogayshidae/single/?p=8601237&t=9140814

Could be more than one IDK just please investigate and ban.
^this. and the one who posted this:
http://w11.zetaboards.com/sogayshidae/single/?p=8601071&t=9140814

i think this person posted the second pic to get attention to the dude
Quote Post Goto Top
 
Guest
Unregistered

Isabella's at it again:


http://w11.zetaboards.com/sogayshidae/single/?p=8601315&t=9140814
Quote Post Goto Top
 
Ihla
Member Avatar
I need insoles
Sorry, was a little bit busy. Deleted a couple of obvious posts and I'll be looking into the posts from page 236.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Guest
Unregistered

Ihla
Oct 7 2013, 05:39 PM
Sorry, was a little bit busy. Deleted a couple of obvious posts and I'll be looking into the posts from page 236.
We understand, it's all good as long as they get that ban in the end. Such pathetic fuckers.
Quote Post Goto Top
 
Guest
Unregistered

it's doing it again =_=
http://w11.zetaboards.com/sogayshidae/single/?p=8602095&t=9140814
Quote Post Goto Top
 
Guest
Unregistered

Guest
Oct 8 2013, 06:20 AM
isn't that anon talking about items between each other?
Quote Post Goto Top
 
Guest
Unregistered

Guest
Oct 8 2013, 06:25 AM
Anon
Oct 8 2013, 06:20 AM
isn't that anon talking about items between each other?
i'm not sure what you're saying, what difference does it make what the anon was talking about? huge quote, where she broke one of the img tags but not the other two and then reposted an image that's already in the post she quoted
Quote Post Goto Top
 
Guest
Unregistered

LOL

Posted Image
Quote Post Goto Top
 
orangedaffodils
Member Avatar
Let ε <0
Guest
Oct 8 2013, 06:48 AM
then reposted an image that's already in the post she quoted
Yeah, you're right.

it's essentially a repost and just takes up space. I'll go ahead and get rid of it :thumbsup:
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Guest
Unregistered

orangedaffodils
Oct 8 2013, 07:05 AM
Anon
Oct 8 2013, 06:48 AM
then reposted an image that's already in the post she quoted
Yeah, you're right.

it's essentially a repost and just takes up space. I'll go ahead and get rid of it :thumbsup:
Are you fucking kidding me? You leave off an anti Seo image but this you want to get rid off because "takes up space" from all the bullshit that gets posted here daily? Great modding there with correct priorities because one bitch complained about a "huge post" yeah I can see how that breaks rules that merit you messing with someone's post. :eyeroll:
Quote Post Goto Top
 
orangedaffodils
Member Avatar
Let ε <0
iirc, it was suggested that we simply "keep an eye" on that user. Which we did. And they were taken care of accordingly.

It's a repost and if there wasn't a problem with it, then it probably wouldn't have been posted here as a potential troll post.

About my modding, i'm sorry you feel that way.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Guest
Unregistered

OK OD just deleted a post that quoted this and posted this saying that maybe Jessica was pointing they needed to renew their items hence why they went to Tiffany Co.

Can any of the two admins tell me what rule that post broke that merited OD deleting the post? I already know the answer, there is none, just wanted to point that out. Nothing, nothing merited OD messing with that post let alone deleting it.

I really want to read any reasons you can come up with because they will all be bullshit, nothing merited deleting the post.
Quote Post Goto Top
 
orangedaffodils
Member Avatar
Let ε <0
You reposted an image that was already within the quote. Not to mention, you also posted it previously as well here.

Taken from the Rules/Intro/FAQ thread:

Posted Image

This is not the first time anons have expressed recent displeasure with yoonsic and you likely knew dredging that post up would cause wank (the quote wasn't even made in the last 5 pages). It may not be a rule explicitly outlined, but there are guidelines the forum has with how to deal with trolls/shit-stirrers (which is what other anons believed your post to be). No admins seem to be here atm, so it was up to my jurisdiction as how to deal with it; avoiding wank altogether is the easiest thing to do.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Guest
Unregistered

I said admins, I don't care for your so called reasoning since there is none.


As expected there is nothing to merit the deletion...
It was an anon not anons.
There was no further quoting of the post nor comments about it on the thread.
There is nothing to induce wank.
Reposting a picture does not merit deletion because you would have to delete at least 80% of all image and video posts.
That image is so small when resized anyone can miss it.
You had 0 grounds and that's not going to change, that post was as much meriting deletion as this or this.
"Huge posts" are not against the rules but if they were:
http://w11.zetaboards.com/sogayshidae/single/?p=8601580&t=9140814
http://w11.zetaboards.com/sogayshidae/single/?p=8601583&t=9140814
http://w11.zetaboards.com/sogayshidae/single/?p=8601516&t=9140814
http://w11.zetaboards.com/sogayshidae/single/?p=8601532&t=9140814
How offensive!

That quote from the rules is off base, anyone can report anything they want, doesn't mean you go deleting posts nilly willy.
Please stop trying to explain this away, there were no grounds for deletion. Just none.
Don't go bringing this anon or that anon recent displeasure with anything, that gives no merits either.
There is more than recent displeasure with a lot of things like stan wank, anti posts and Isabellas.
We don't see you running to delete those posts which have actually wanked up the thread so that makes this choice to delete even that more glaringly atrocious.

You may have had your reasons but none of them were grounded in rules (the post didn't break any), the present situation or logic so don't try really its not going to work, you would just be insulting collective intelligence.
Quote Post Goto Top
 
Guest
Unregistered

If reposting images is such an offense in some invisible, enchanted rule book none of us can see then you'll have to delete one of these posts:

http://w11.zetaboards.com/sogayshidae/single/?p=8602172&t=9140814
http://w11.zetaboards.com/sogayshidae/single/?p=8602178&t=9140814

Cause look, she posted the same pic TWICE on the SAME PAGE!!!! :O
In fact all her recent posts would have to be deleted because all of those images have been posted before sometime before.
Quote Post Goto Top
 
orangedaffodils
Member Avatar
Let ε <0
Guest
Oct 8 2013, 08:14 AM
I said admins, I don't care for your so called reasoning since there is none.
Yet here you are responding to me instead of waiting for one.

in any case:

1) It doesn't take much effort to backtrack through the main thread to see how irritated more than 1 anon is with yoonsic posts - most of which come from you, as i'm sure you've realized.

2) There wasn't any further comments on it because, as is customary with deemed shit-stirring posts, it gets reported or posted here. So I deleted it when it was complained about.

3) Reposting an image, no. Reposting one that was clearly already within the comment you're quoting, yes. And image resizing isn't that illusive; it's pretty easy to see. It's not exactly a thumbnail.

4) You keep touting I had "0 grounds, no merit!" but if that were the case, the subject of your post wouldn't be up for debate in the first place...

5) I never said huge posts are against the rules. In fact, I never said anything about the rules. Like I said before, we have guidelines on how to deal with shit-stirrers and trolls - of which you were deemed, or at least your post was. Reposting does take up unnecessary space, especially when the reposted image is already within the comment you're quoting, so your point doesn't really hold regardless.

6) You're right, there's recent displeasure with a lot of stuff recently, but that is mostly discussion. The obvious trolls are not replied to and the discussion continues. And eventually, it dies. As all discussion do at some point. The whole situation is not exactly the same thing as reposting an image that's already within the quote as well as dredging up a post from yesterday just to be able to do so. Please don't act coy, you know what you were doing. Also, contrary to popular belief, I am actually not here 24/7!! I can't catch everything - but I caught this, and that's what matters.

You keep going back to "rules, rules rules!!" as if that amounts to anything when I clearly said nothing about the sort. Whatever logic you're purportedly holding and i'm not has no relevance to this conversation: it was never about explicitly outlined rules - it was about shit-stirring - of which i've already said when I posted an excerpt from the Rules/Intro/FAQ thread. If you'd like to go look at it yourself, then go ahead.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Guest
Unregistered

1 and 3 are irrelevant/NA.
2. That's the problem, there was nothing wrong with it but posts that are clear Isabella for example are left behind. Troll posts that are then acknowledged at such when they quote themselves are also left behind. You did nothing to save the thread from wank, that post had been up for an hour and nothing but one complaint from one anon which no one else endorsed.
4. Not true, any post can seem suspicious to anyone so it being called into question doesn't prove there was a valid reason for it to be called into question in the first place.
5. Deemed by some anon, since when do mods just follow what anyone says just like that? Clear troll posts like that anti Seo troll were deemed harmless at first and left in the thread even though they were manips leaving Seo off the group. Yet somehow a post with some recent image and a comment supported by that image was so terrible at first glance, when the anti Seo troll wasn't, that you had to run to delete it? Complete bullshit, never has a post "taking up space" been important or else most post could not exists.
6. BS, the trolls are well fed, the Isabellas were fed quite well yesterday, same with our new boxfany anti Taeyeon posts, all quoted and discussed giving them more chances to post.

I keep going back to rules because they tell us the posters what is allowed or not but they also tell you the mods what is allowed or not. So you may not like a post, some anon may not like a post but if it doesn't even break a rule you better have a good explanation for taking any actions against the post or the poster. This is simple, your line is, its OK to delete because of shit stirring but honestly, there was nothing to make it shit stirring and if you deemed it shit stirring because no one else said it that's even more of a problem. Like what the hell is going on that actual wanking posts are left behind to keep wanking up the thread but a post that didn't gets cut? So what if the same image was somewhere up there? That doesn't make it deletion worthy in the slightest especially when the post also had a comment not the image alone. It didn't deserve editing either but if anything was going to be done then deleting the image in the quoted post could have worked. Everything that happened is so ridiculous that it boggles the mind. This is honestly embarrassing and frightening, deleting that post was groundless and a mistake which is not being recognized at that means it can happen again. Frightening is the image of posts being deleted nilly willy because one anon complained, no one else did, the post made no waves, broke no rules, absolutely no reasoning can explain it because shit stirring is so far beyond reason but poof they are gone.
Quote Post Goto Top
 
Guest
Unregistered

everyone else thinks you're overreacting and that yoonsic anon is annoying as fuck
Quote Post Goto Top
 
kkab cakes
Member Avatar
MEXIBOGGU
Haha pretty sure I didn't post that same image twice. I copied the link then x'd it out when making my posts.


Is this the same troll from before?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
orangedaffodils
Member Avatar
Let ε <0
1) and 3) are irrelevant how? I was simply responding/answering the previous points you made. If those responses are irrelevant than your explanations are more than likely irrelevant to the issue as well.

Troll posts who quote themselves are taken care of. Never said you were trolling anyway, but your post was a shit-stirring post. It's not going to be as obvious, ofc. And don't you think after the anti-seo debacle i'm attempting to be more mindful of the posts that get complained about in here? You express concern at inaction yet when action is taken, you're also not satisfied. I realize it's because you posted it, so you're biased, but the principle still stands - it's hypocritical. In regards to that issue, Ihla already made a post before me with her decision. She's admin, and if she thought the best method was to keep an eye out rather than outright delete and ban, then I trust her judgement.

Your point 4) doesn't make sense. No innocent post is ever going to be called into question - the only posts called into question are the ones that can potentially cause wank, which yours apparently did. You're being pedantic about it when you clearly know and understand what kinds of posts get called into question here.

You're attempting to twist my words with the "take up space" part. I'll clarify for you though: yes, it does take up space. That's not why I deleted it though. Please reread my OP in responding the the anon complaining who said that you reposted an image within the comment you were quoting, of whom originally thought you to be the wanker from earlier today. The fact that they thought that says a lot about your post.

Like I said, i'm not here all the time. If the admins were here, which I believe they were, and deemed that stuff ok to leave up then it was probably ok. Also, if you scroll up, you'll see that whatever was reported for whatever reason regarding the isabella probelm has been deleted. In regards to other issues like stan wars etc on the main thread, we don't have any complaints here or reports in the contact staff inbox; must've not been too big of a deal. Besides, you don't need nannies for the thread - you all are big girls capable of handling when discussions get a bit heated.

The only thing embarrassing is you harping on about the issue because you are personally slighted that someone deemed your post shit-stirring. Many complaints here are made only by one person per issue; complaints made by a single person are still valuable and you're silly to think otherwise.

This will be my last post to you for tonight. If you're so keen on waiting for an admin, then wait for one and stop wasting your precious time trying to speak with me since you've made it clear you don't "care for my reasoning".

@kkab: if you mean the presumably male troll from weeks ago, then no. idk what other troll you might be referring to :P
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
Go to Next Page
« Previous Topic · General Discussion · Next Topic »
Add Reply

Banner design by Taetum