|
'pure' types?
|
|
Topic Started: Oct 10 2007, 11:59:14 PM (341 Views)
|
|
sean|nooby4life19
|
Oct 10 2007, 11:59:14 PM
Post #1
|
fix your teeth faggot
- Posts:
- 8,649
- Group:
- Ex-TLP
- Member
- #41
- Joined:
- Aug 11 2007
|
Wow, i've personally played a pretty long time on and off since dec 2001, like off the year 2003 and on 2004 etc, but i just really wanna state.
People say "make a barrow pure" and "Cool rune pure"
A pure is some one with higher HP than his combat basically, and has focused on some things, like strength & attack. But there are NOT rune pures, barrow, 30 def, 20 def pures. They aren't pures if they do that. People make others confused then the people they confused believe what ever the one person said.
But the only thing even close to being a pure is like a 1 def pure There aren't rune , barrows etc.
End rant just wanted to say
|


- Quote:
-
Nooby4life19 owns 24 games worth: $424.89 USDNooby4life19 has had a Steam account since: December 4, 2005, or ~50 months Nooby4life19 has spent an average of $8.50 USD per month What's Your Account Worth?
|
| |
|
Zaru
|
Oct 11 2007, 12:00:42 AM
Post #2
|
omg basedgod you can fuck my bitch basedgod
- Posts:
- 10,528
- Group:
- Honourable Guest
- Member
- #228
- Joined:
- Aug 11 2007
|
Yup. The only pure is a one defense pure.
|
[img]http://img594.imageshack.us/img594/8886/294500.jpg[/img]
In hidden words which lurk behind the veil The coils of the serpent swallowing its tail
NHS Hail Victory 4-track Ladytron covers and vanished dreams LOVE SLAVES OF SATAN TORTURED TO BLOOD-DRIPPING DEATH, OH MY
|
| |
|
Brendan_
|
Oct 11 2007, 12:11:21 AM
Post #3
|
вяєиdαи™
- Posts:
- 8,610
- Group:
- Special Guest
- Member
- #79
- Joined:
- Aug 11 2007
|
I hate the faggots that say 1 def can't be pure either.
Just NO. There's a whole new definition for pure on rs and they can't accept it.
Beat me to this rant btw =p
|
Long live #peaches || http://z8.invisionfree.com/Team_Peach/index.php
|
| |
|
sean|nooby4life19
|
Oct 11 2007, 12:15:54 AM
Post #4
|
fix your teeth faggot
- Posts:
- 8,649
- Group:
- Ex-TLP
- Member
- #41
- Joined:
- Aug 11 2007
|
- Death Soljah
- Oct 11 2007, 12:11 AM
I hate the faggots that say 1 def can't be pure either.
Just NO. There's a whole new definition for pure on rs and they can't accept it.
Beat me to this rant btw =p
wait are you agreeing or disagreeing with me :|
|


- Quote:
-
Nooby4life19 owns 24 games worth: $424.89 USDNooby4life19 has had a Steam account since: December 4, 2005, or ~50 months Nooby4life19 has spent an average of $8.50 USD per month What's Your Account Worth?
|
| |
|
Brendan_
|
Oct 11 2007, 12:18:43 AM
Post #5
|
вяєиdαи™
- Posts:
- 8,610
- Group:
- Special Guest
- Member
- #79
- Joined:
- Aug 11 2007
|
- Sean|Nooby4life19
- Oct 11 2007, 12:15 AM
- Death Soljah
- Oct 11 2007, 12:11 AM
I hate the faggots that say 1 def can't be pure either.
Just NO. There's a whole new definition for pure on rs and they can't accept it.
Beat me to this rant btw =p
wait are you agreeing or disagreeing with me :|
Agreeing lol. I'm just saying that people who take the real life definition of pure too literally, and say that 1 def pures wouldn't techincally be pure either.
|
Long live #peaches || http://z8.invisionfree.com/Team_Peach/index.php
|
| |
|
Legolas963
|
Oct 11 2007, 12:30:06 AM
Post #6
|
o rly?
- Posts:
- 210
- Group:
- Forum Guest
- Member
- #208
- Joined:
- Aug 11 2007
|
I agree. Always have to correct noobs when they say "lulz i r maik baros pur and own u".
|
|
Hello there, Gary@@@@ -Mearrr
|
| |
|
Chill
|
Oct 11 2007, 12:34:07 AM
Post #7
|
play it cool kiby
- Posts:
- 25,366
- Group:
- Honourable Guest
- Member
- #328
- Joined:
- Aug 12 2007
|
- Sean|Nooby4life19
- Oct 10 2007, 11:59 PM
Wow, i've personally played a pretty long time on and off since dec 2001, like off the year 2003 and on 2004 etc, but i just really wanna state.
People say "make a barrow pure" and "Cool rune pure"
A pure is some one with higher HP than his combat basically, and has focused on some things, like strength & attack. But there are NOT rune pures, barrow, 30 def, 20 def pures. They aren't pures if they do that. People make others confused then the people they confused believe what ever the one person said.
But the only thing even close to being a pure is like a 1 def pure There aren't rune , barrows etc.
End rant just wanted to say
This was moot as soon as RS2 was released.
But yeah in RSC, a person was "pure" by how high their hp was over their combat. This was pretty lame anyways because you could have 40 atk 45 str 25 defense and still be 39 combat with 40 hp, but it was a general idea.
|
|
jesus christ its a snail
|
| |
|
sean|nooby4life19
|
Oct 11 2007, 12:35:04 AM
Post #8
|
fix your teeth faggot
- Posts:
- 8,649
- Group:
- Ex-TLP
- Member
- #41
- Joined:
- Aug 11 2007
|
- Kiba
- Oct 11 2007, 12:34 AM
- Sean|Nooby4life19
- Oct 10 2007, 11:59 PM
Wow, i've personally played a pretty long time on and off since dec 2001, like off the year 2003 and on 2004 etc, but i just really wanna state.
People say "make a barrow pure" and "Cool rune pure"
A pure is some one with higher HP than his combat basically, and has focused on some things, like strength & attack. But there are NOT rune pures, barrow, 30 def, 20 def pures. They aren't pures if they do that. People make others confused then the people they confused believe what ever the one person said.
But the only thing even close to being a pure is like a 1 def pure There aren't rune , barrows etc.
End rant just wanted to say
This was moot as soon as RS2 was released. But yeah in RSC, a person was "pure" by how high their hp was over their combat. This was pretty lame anyways because you could have 40 atk 45 str 25 defense and still be 39 combat with 40 hp, but it was a general idea.
When rs2 was made, IMO it helped the wild some but mostly ruined it.
|


- Quote:
-
Nooby4life19 owns 24 games worth: $424.89 USDNooby4life19 has had a Steam account since: December 4, 2005, or ~50 months Nooby4life19 has spent an average of $8.50 USD per month What's Your Account Worth?
|
| |
|
Chill
|
Oct 11 2007, 12:40:15 AM
Post #9
|
play it cool kiby
- Posts:
- 25,366
- Group:
- Honourable Guest
- Member
- #328
- Joined:
- Aug 12 2007
|
- Sean|Nooby4life19
- Oct 11 2007, 12:35 AM
- Kiba
- Oct 11 2007, 12:34 AM
- Sean|Nooby4life19
- Oct 10 2007, 11:59 PM
Wow, i've personally played a pretty long time on and off since dec 2001, like off the year 2003 and on 2004 etc, but i just really wanna state.
People say "make a barrow pure" and "Cool rune pure"
A pure is some one with higher HP than his combat basically, and has focused on some things, like strength & attack. But there are NOT rune pures, barrow, 30 def, 20 def pures. They aren't pures if they do that. People make others confused then the people they confused believe what ever the one person said.
But the only thing even close to being a pure is like a 1 def pure There aren't rune , barrows etc.
End rant just wanted to say
This was moot as soon as RS2 was released. But yeah in RSC, a person was "pure" by how high their hp was over their combat. This was pretty lame anyways because you could have 40 atk 45 str 25 defense and still be 39 combat with 40 hp, but it was a general idea.
When rs2 was made, IMO it helped the wild some but mostly ruined it.
RS2 fixed the bug in wild, that was generally known as "catching" an opponent. I liked RSC wild but that could just be because I was use to it. I think early RS2 was much more adaptive than RSC. If I had a timeframe in which I could say was the best, it would have been during the release of specials until mauls and whips were released.
Wild was perfect. Magic was still below average, but range and melee were well balanced. Range hit hard, but melee's had granite shield, bers/warrior helm, and rune, using either D long or D b-axe..with dagger (even though dagger was much weaker than it is now, it still had effect against low defense; dragonhide)
Range was effective even with one special, and melee still could pull some awesome combos and stay protected defensively too.
If you could implement mystic robes into this time frame, it would have been perfect.
|
|
jesus christ its a snail
|
| |
|
Zaru
|
Oct 11 2007, 12:41:44 AM
Post #10
|
omg basedgod you can fuck my bitch basedgod
- Posts:
- 10,528
- Group:
- Honourable Guest
- Member
- #228
- Joined:
- Aug 11 2007
|
- Kiba
- Oct 11 2007, 12:40 AM
- Sean|Nooby4life19
- Oct 11 2007, 12:35 AM
- Kiba
- Oct 11 2007, 12:34 AM
- Sean|Nooby4life19
- Oct 10 2007, 11:59 PM
Wow, i've personally played a pretty long time on and off since dec 2001, like off the year 2003 and on 2004 etc, but i just really wanna state.
People say "make a barrow pure" and "Cool rune pure"
A pure is some one with higher HP than his combat basically, and has focused on some things, like strength & attack. But there are NOT rune pures, barrow, 30 def, 20 def pures. They aren't pures if they do that. People make others confused then the people they confused believe what ever the one person said.
But the only thing even close to being a pure is like a 1 def pure There aren't rune , barrows etc.
End rant just wanted to say
This was moot as soon as RS2 was released. But yeah in RSC, a person was "pure" by how high their hp was over their combat. This was pretty lame anyways because you could have 40 atk 45 str 25 defense and still be 39 combat with 40 hp, but it was a general idea.
When rs2 was made, IMO it helped the wild some but mostly ruined it.
RS2 fixed the bug in wild, that was generally known as "catching" an opponent. I liked RSC wild but that could just be because I was use to it. I think early RS2 was much more adaptive than RSC. If I had a timeframe in which I could say was the best, it would have been during the release of specials until mauls and whips were released. Wild was perfect. Magic was still below average, but range and melee were well balanced. Range hit hard, but melee's had granite shield, bers/warrior helm, and rune, using either D long or D b-axe..with dagger (even though dagger was much weaker than it is now, it still had effect against low defense; dragonhide) Range was effective even with one special, and melee still could pull some awesome combos and stay protected defensively too. If you could implement mystic robes into this time frame, it would have been perfect.
And add catching =D
|
[img]http://img594.imageshack.us/img594/8886/294500.jpg[/img]
In hidden words which lurk behind the veil The coils of the serpent swallowing its tail
NHS Hail Victory 4-track Ladytron covers and vanished dreams LOVE SLAVES OF SATAN TORTURED TO BLOOD-DRIPPING DEATH, OH MY
|
| |
|
Chill
|
Oct 11 2007, 12:44:08 AM
Post #11
|
play it cool kiby
- Posts:
- 25,366
- Group:
- Honourable Guest
- Member
- #328
- Joined:
- Aug 12 2007
|
- Topide
- Oct 11 2007, 12:41 AM
- Kiba
- Oct 11 2007, 12:40 AM
- Sean|Nooby4life19
- Oct 11 2007, 12:35 AM
- Kiba
- Oct 11 2007, 12:34 AM
- Sean|Nooby4life19
- Oct 10 2007, 11:59 PM
Wow, i've personally played a pretty long time on and off since dec 2001, like off the year 2003 and on 2004 etc, but i just really wanna state.
People say "make a barrow pure" and "Cool rune pure"
A pure is some one with higher HP than his combat basically, and has focused on some things, like strength & attack. But there are NOT rune pures, barrow, 30 def, 20 def pures. They aren't pures if they do that. People make others confused then the people they confused believe what ever the one person said.
But the only thing even close to being a pure is like a 1 def pure There aren't rune , barrows etc.
End rant just wanted to say
This was moot as soon as RS2 was released. But yeah in RSC, a person was "pure" by how high their hp was over their combat. This was pretty lame anyways because you could have 40 atk 45 str 25 defense and still be 39 combat with 40 hp, but it was a general idea.
When rs2 was made, IMO it helped the wild some but mostly ruined it.
RS2 fixed the bug in wild, that was generally known as "catching" an opponent. I liked RSC wild but that could just be because I was use to it. I think early RS2 was much more adaptive than RSC. If I had a timeframe in which I could say was the best, it would have been during the release of specials until mauls and whips were released. Wild was perfect. Magic was still below average, but range and melee were well balanced. Range hit hard, but melee's had granite shield, bers/warrior helm, and rune, using either D long or D b-axe..with dagger (even though dagger was much weaker than it is now, it still had effect against low defense; dragonhide) Range was effective even with one special, and melee still could pull some awesome combos and stay protected defensively too. If you could implement mystic robes into this time frame, it would have been perfect.
And add catching =D
Catching was a pain in the ass. RSC gave a person no reason to train up magic. Implementing roots and effective godspells was more effective. A shame people were stuck with crappy mage gear until slayer was released, which got mages owned with maul specs and whips anyways.
|
|
jesus christ its a snail
|
| |
|
Zaru
|
Oct 11 2007, 12:51:36 AM
Post #12
|
omg basedgod you can fuck my bitch basedgod
- Posts:
- 10,528
- Group:
- Honourable Guest
- Member
- #228
- Joined:
- Aug 11 2007
|
- Kiba
- Oct 11 2007, 12:44 AM
- Topide
- Oct 11 2007, 12:41 AM
- Kiba
- Oct 11 2007, 12:40 AM
- Sean|Nooby4life19
- Oct 11 2007, 12:35 AM
- Kiba
- Oct 11 2007, 12:34 AM
- Sean|Nooby4life19
- Oct 10 2007, 11:59 PM
Wow, i've personally played a pretty long time on and off since dec 2001, like off the year 2003 and on 2004 etc, but i just really wanna state.
People say "make a barrow pure" and "Cool rune pure"
A pure is some one with higher HP than his combat basically, and has focused on some things, like strength & attack. But there are NOT rune pures, barrow, 30 def, 20 def pures. They aren't pures if they do that. People make others confused then the people they confused believe what ever the one person said.
But the only thing even close to being a pure is like a 1 def pure There aren't rune , barrows etc.
End rant just wanted to say
This was moot as soon as RS2 was released. But yeah in RSC, a person was "pure" by how high their hp was over their combat. This was pretty lame anyways because you could have 40 atk 45 str 25 defense and still be 39 combat with 40 hp, but it was a general idea.
When rs2 was made, IMO it helped the wild some but mostly ruined it.
RS2 fixed the bug in wild, that was generally known as "catching" an opponent. I liked RSC wild but that could just be because I was use to it. I think early RS2 was much more adaptive than RSC. If I had a timeframe in which I could say was the best, it would have been during the release of specials until mauls and whips were released. Wild was perfect. Magic was still below average, but range and melee were well balanced. Range hit hard, but melee's had granite shield, bers/warrior helm, and rune, using either D long or D b-axe..with dagger (even though dagger was much weaker than it is now, it still had effect against low defense; dragonhide) Range was effective even with one special, and melee still could pull some awesome combos and stay protected defensively too. If you could implement mystic robes into this time frame, it would have been perfect.
And add catching =D
Catching was a pain in the ass. RSC gave a person no reason to train up magic. Implementing roots and effective godspells was more effective. A shame people were stuck with crappy mage gear until slayer was released, which got mages owned with maul specs and whips anyways.
Meh, I guess you're right. Catching was essential though without magic in RSC, in my opinion.
|
[img]http://img594.imageshack.us/img594/8886/294500.jpg[/img]
In hidden words which lurk behind the veil The coils of the serpent swallowing its tail
NHS Hail Victory 4-track Ladytron covers and vanished dreams LOVE SLAVES OF SATAN TORTURED TO BLOOD-DRIPPING DEATH, OH MY
|
| |
|
Chill
|
Oct 11 2007, 01:00:02 AM
Post #13
|
play it cool kiby
- Posts:
- 25,366
- Group:
- Honourable Guest
- Member
- #328
- Joined:
- Aug 12 2007
|
- Topide
- Oct 11 2007, 12:51 AM
- Kiba
- Oct 11 2007, 12:44 AM
- Topide
- Oct 11 2007, 12:41 AM
- Kiba
- Oct 11 2007, 12:40 AM
- Sean|Nooby4life19
- Oct 11 2007, 12:35 AM
- Kiba
- Oct 11 2007, 12:34 AM
- Sean|Nooby4life19
- Oct 10 2007, 11:59 PM
Wow, i've personally played a pretty long time on and off since dec 2001, like off the year 2003 and on 2004 etc, but i just really wanna state.
People say "make a barrow pure" and "Cool rune pure"
A pure is some one with higher HP than his combat basically, and has focused on some things, like strength & attack. But there are NOT rune pures, barrow, 30 def, 20 def pures. They aren't pures if they do that. People make others confused then the people they confused believe what ever the one person said.
But the only thing even close to being a pure is like a 1 def pure There aren't rune , barrows etc.
End rant just wanted to say
This was moot as soon as RS2 was released. But yeah in RSC, a person was "pure" by how high their hp was over their combat. This was pretty lame anyways because you could have 40 atk 45 str 25 defense and still be 39 combat with 40 hp, but it was a general idea.
When rs2 was made, IMO it helped the wild some but mostly ruined it.
RS2 fixed the bug in wild, that was generally known as "catching" an opponent. I liked RSC wild but that could just be because I was use to it. I think early RS2 was much more adaptive than RSC. If I had a timeframe in which I could say was the best, it would have been during the release of specials until mauls and whips were released. Wild was perfect. Magic was still below average, but range and melee were well balanced. Range hit hard, but melee's had granite shield, bers/warrior helm, and rune, using either D long or D b-axe..with dagger (even though dagger was much weaker than it is now, it still had effect against low defense; dragonhide) Range was effective even with one special, and melee still could pull some awesome combos and stay protected defensively too. If you could implement mystic robes into this time frame, it would have been perfect.
And add catching =D
Catching was a pain in the ass. RSC gave a person no reason to train up magic. Implementing roots and effective godspells was more effective. A shame people were stuck with crappy mage gear until slayer was released, which got mages owned with maul specs and whips anyways.
Meh, I guess you're right. Catching was essential though without magic in RSC, in my opinion.
Well of course it was :P
RS2 there's no need for it now though. Thinking about 3 round fights in RS2 would be a bit tacky. Everyone would just run around as archers because you can hit the person even if they were running. Would be a lot easier than using melee to catch them.
|
|
jesus christ its a snail
|
| |
|
i own n33bs
|
Oct 11 2007, 01:33:03 AM
Post #14
|
Kay Kay Just Jay Is Gay
- Posts:
- 3,526
- Group:
- Honourable Guest
- Member
- #576
- Joined:
- Aug 16 2007
|
think there called "hybrids" now which is a gay name for pure
|

 Remeber I_P00n_N33bs Proud Ex TLP
|
| |
|
Pur3range
|
Oct 11 2007, 02:15:33 AM
Post #15
|
Fuck You
- Posts:
- 11,139
- Group:
- Special Guest
- Member
- #401
- Joined:
- Aug 12 2007
|
Pisses me off when they diss my stats and say shit like "I can own you on my barrow pure"
|
|
| |
|
Tim
|
Oct 12 2007, 02:33:13 AM
Post #16
|
7-4
- Posts:
- 21,841
- Group:
- ^Elder
- Member
- #283
- Joined:
- Aug 12 2007
|
i can own you on my main lvl 88
|

I knew that you wouldn't change, but I bit my tongue and swore, Resigned myself to carry on despite you. But you would not match my stride and cried, "Foul! Foul! How could you expect me to care about somebody else?" And after all, who would expect anything else from you?
lmao wats up friend - SKOTTY
|
| |
|
Deleted User
|
Oct 12 2007, 03:46:10 AM
Post #17
|
|
Deleted User
|
It's because of all the new updates.. Barrows, defenders, gloves, torsoes.. You name it, you have to realize that it's not the same as it was and live with it lol..
|
|
|
| |
|
Tek
|
Oct 12 2007, 04:58:02 AM
Post #18
|
shit dont get real, people do.
- Posts:
- 5,932
- Group:
- Ex-TLP
- Member
- #818
- Joined:
- Aug 24 2007
|
You act like everyone who plays RS will see this rant,
|
|
| |
|
jeremy_w
|
Oct 13 2007, 12:30:25 AM
Post #19
|
- Posts:
- 1,049
- Group:
- Ex-TLP
- Member
- #958
- Joined:
- Aug 27 2007
|
The term Rune Pure comes from RSC, 45 defence and 30 defence and 20 defence would've been HP > Combat on RSC, shows what that 3 years of RSC has taught you.
Barrows pures are just complete and utter bullshit though, and I see where you're coming from.
|
 It's teamballs otherwise you're gay
|
| |
|
Brendan_
|
Oct 13 2007, 12:53:14 AM
Post #20
|
вяєиdαи™
- Posts:
- 8,610
- Group:
- Special Guest
- Member
- #79
- Joined:
- Aug 11 2007
|
- jeremy_w
- Oct 13 2007, 12:30 AM
The term Rune Pure comes from RSC, 45 defence and 30 defence and 20 defence would've been HP > Combat on RSC, shows what that 3 years of RSC has taught you.
Barrows pures are just complete and utter bullshit though, and I see where you're coming from.
I don't think fremmenik helms were out during RSC, no?
And actually, if you have 45 def, your HP is almost always lower than your combat, and I don't see any usefulness from 45 def at that stage of runescape anyways.
|
Long live #peaches || http://z8.invisionfree.com/Team_Peach/index.php
|
| |
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
|