Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]

Image and video hosting by TinyPic







Image and video hosting by TinyPic


Image and video hosting by TinyPic
Image and video hosting by TinyPic




[The Last Pures IRC Channel]
#TLP

[The Last Pures - Quick Links]
[The Last Pures - Rules]
[The Last Pures - Introduction]
[The Last Pures - Junior Application]
[The Last Pures - Member Application]

[Public Clan Chat]
TLP CC

[Community]
Runescape Community
Pure Warfare


Add Reply
  • Pages:
  • 1
'pure' types?
Topic Started: Oct 10 2007, 11:59:14 PM (343 Views)
sean|nooby4life19
Member Avatar
fix your teeth faggot

Wow, i've personally played a pretty long time on and off since dec 2001, like off the year 2003 and on 2004 etc, but i just really wanna state.

People say "make a barrow pure" and "Cool rune pure"

A pure is some one with higher HP than his combat basically, and has focused on some things, like strength & attack. But there are NOT rune pures, barrow, 30 def, 20 def pures. They aren't pures if they do that. People make others confused then the people they confused believe what ever the one person said.

But the only thing even close to being a pure is like a 1 def pure
There aren't rune , barrows etc.

End rant just wanted to say
Posted Image

Posted Image
Quote:
 
Nooby4life19 owns 24 games worth: $424.89 USD
Nooby4life19 has had a Steam account since: December 4, 2005, or ~50 months
Nooby4life19 has spent an average of $8.50 USD per month
What's Your Account Worth?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Zaru
Member Avatar
omg basedgod you can fuck my bitch basedgod

Yup. The only pure is a one defense pure.
[img]http://img594.imageshack.us/img594/8886/294500.jpg[/img]

In hidden words which lurk behind the veil
The coils of the serpent swallowing its tail


NHS Hail Victory
4-track Ladytron covers and vanished dreams
LOVE SLAVES OF SATAN TORTURED TO BLOOD-DRIPPING DEATH, OH MY
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Brendan_
Member Avatar
вяєиdαи™

I hate the faggots that say 1 def can't be pure either.

Just NO. There's a whole new definition for pure on rs and they can't accept it.

Beat me to this rant btw =p

Long live #peaches || http://z8.invisionfree.com/Team_Peach/index.php

Posted Image
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
sean|nooby4life19
Member Avatar
fix your teeth faggot

Death Soljah
Oct 11 2007, 12:11 AM
I hate the faggots that say 1 def can't be pure either.

Just NO. There's a whole new definition for pure on rs and they can't accept it.

Beat me to this rant btw =p

wait are you agreeing or disagreeing with me :|



Posted Image

Posted Image
Quote:
 
Nooby4life19 owns 24 games worth: $424.89 USD
Nooby4life19 has had a Steam account since: December 4, 2005, or ~50 months
Nooby4life19 has spent an average of $8.50 USD per month
What's Your Account Worth?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Brendan_
Member Avatar
вяєиdαи™

Sean|Nooby4life19
Oct 11 2007, 12:15 AM
Death Soljah
Oct 11 2007, 12:11 AM
I hate the faggots that say 1 def can't be pure either.

Just NO. There's a whole new definition for pure on rs and they can't accept it.

Beat me to this rant btw =p

wait are you agreeing or disagreeing with me :|

Agreeing lol. I'm just saying that people who take the real life definition of pure too literally, and say that 1 def pures wouldn't techincally be pure either.

Long live #peaches || http://z8.invisionfree.com/Team_Peach/index.php

Posted Image
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Legolas963
Member Avatar
o rly?

I agree. Always have to correct noobs when they say "lulz i r maik baros pur and own u".
Hello there, Gary@@@@ -Mearrr
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Chill
Member Avatar
play it cool kiby

Sean|Nooby4life19
Oct 10 2007, 11:59 PM
Wow, i've personally played a pretty long time on and off since dec 2001, like off the year 2003 and on 2004 etc, but i just really wanna state.

People say "make a barrow pure" and "Cool rune pure"

A pure is some one with higher HP than his combat basically, and has focused on some things, like strength & attack. But there are NOT rune pures, barrow, 30 def, 20 def pures. They aren't pures if they do that. People make others confused then the people they confused believe what ever the one person said.

But the only thing even close to being a pure is like a 1 def pure
There aren't rune , barrows etc.

End rant just wanted to say

This was moot as soon as RS2 was released.

But yeah in RSC, a person was "pure" by how high their hp was over their combat. This was pretty lame anyways because you could have 40 atk 45 str 25 defense and still be 39 combat with 40 hp, but it was a general idea.
jesus christ its a snail
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
sean|nooby4life19
Member Avatar
fix your teeth faggot

Kiba
Oct 11 2007, 12:34 AM
Sean|Nooby4life19
Oct 10 2007, 11:59 PM
Wow, i've personally played a pretty long time on and off since dec 2001, like off the year 2003 and on 2004 etc, but i just really wanna state.

People say "make a barrow pure" and "Cool rune pure"

A pure is some one with higher HP than his combat basically, and has focused on some things, like strength & attack. But there are NOT rune pures, barrow, 30 def, 20 def pures. They aren't pures if they do that. People make others confused then the people they confused believe what ever the one person said.

But the only thing even close to being a pure is like a 1 def pure
There aren't rune , barrows etc.

End rant just wanted to say

This was moot as soon as RS2 was released.

But yeah in RSC, a person was "pure" by how high their hp was over their combat. This was pretty lame anyways because you could have 40 atk 45 str 25 defense and still be 39 combat with 40 hp, but it was a general idea.

When rs2 was made, IMO it helped the wild some but mostly ruined it.
Posted Image

Posted Image
Quote:
 
Nooby4life19 owns 24 games worth: $424.89 USD
Nooby4life19 has had a Steam account since: December 4, 2005, or ~50 months
Nooby4life19 has spent an average of $8.50 USD per month
What's Your Account Worth?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Chill
Member Avatar
play it cool kiby

Sean|Nooby4life19
Oct 11 2007, 12:35 AM
Kiba
Oct 11 2007, 12:34 AM
Sean|Nooby4life19
Oct 10 2007, 11:59 PM
Wow, i've personally played a pretty long time on and off since dec 2001, like off the year 2003 and on 2004 etc, but i just really wanna state.

People say "make a barrow pure" and "Cool rune pure"

A pure is some one with higher HP than his combat basically, and has focused on some things, like strength & attack. But there are NOT rune pures, barrow, 30 def, 20 def pures. They aren't pures if they do that. People make others confused then the people they confused believe what ever the one person said.

But the only thing even close to being a pure is like a 1 def pure
There aren't rune , barrows etc.

End rant just wanted to say

This was moot as soon as RS2 was released.

But yeah in RSC, a person was "pure" by how high their hp was over their combat. This was pretty lame anyways because you could have 40 atk 45 str 25 defense and still be 39 combat with 40 hp, but it was a general idea.

When rs2 was made, IMO it helped the wild some but mostly ruined it.

RS2 fixed the bug in wild, that was generally known as "catching" an opponent. I liked RSC wild but that could just be because I was use to it. I think early RS2 was much more adaptive than RSC. If I had a timeframe in which I could say was the best, it would have been during the release of specials until mauls and whips were released.

Wild was perfect. Magic was still below average, but range and melee were well balanced. Range hit hard, but melee's had granite shield, bers/warrior helm, and rune, using either D long or D b-axe..with dagger (even though dagger was much weaker than it is now, it still had effect against low defense; dragonhide)

Range was effective even with one special, and melee still could pull some awesome combos and stay protected defensively too.

If you could implement mystic robes into this time frame, it would have been perfect.
jesus christ its a snail
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Zaru
Member Avatar
omg basedgod you can fuck my bitch basedgod

Kiba
Oct 11 2007, 12:40 AM
Sean|Nooby4life19
Oct 11 2007, 12:35 AM
Kiba
Oct 11 2007, 12:34 AM
Sean|Nooby4life19
Oct 10 2007, 11:59 PM
Wow, i've personally played a pretty long time on and off since dec 2001, like off the year 2003 and on 2004 etc, but i just really wanna state.

People say "make a barrow pure" and "Cool rune pure"

A pure is some one with higher HP than his combat basically, and has focused on some things, like strength & attack. But there are NOT rune pures, barrow, 30 def, 20 def pures. They aren't pures if they do that. People make others confused then the people they confused believe what ever the one person said.

But the only thing even close to being a pure is like a 1 def pure
There aren't rune , barrows etc.

End rant just wanted to say

This was moot as soon as RS2 was released.

But yeah in RSC, a person was "pure" by how high their hp was over their combat. This was pretty lame anyways because you could have 40 atk 45 str 25 defense and still be 39 combat with 40 hp, but it was a general idea.

When rs2 was made, IMO it helped the wild some but mostly ruined it.

RS2 fixed the bug in wild, that was generally known as "catching" an opponent. I liked RSC wild but that could just be because I was use to it. I think early RS2 was much more adaptive than RSC. If I had a timeframe in which I could say was the best, it would have been during the release of specials until mauls and whips were released.

Wild was perfect. Magic was still below average, but range and melee were well balanced. Range hit hard, but melee's had granite shield, bers/warrior helm, and rune, using either D long or D b-axe..with dagger (even though dagger was much weaker than it is now, it still had effect against low defense; dragonhide)

Range was effective even with one special, and melee still could pull some awesome combos and stay protected defensively too.

If you could implement mystic robes into this time frame, it would have been perfect.

And add catching =D
[img]http://img594.imageshack.us/img594/8886/294500.jpg[/img]

In hidden words which lurk behind the veil
The coils of the serpent swallowing its tail


NHS Hail Victory
4-track Ladytron covers and vanished dreams
LOVE SLAVES OF SATAN TORTURED TO BLOOD-DRIPPING DEATH, OH MY
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Chill
Member Avatar
play it cool kiby

Topide
Oct 11 2007, 12:41 AM
Kiba
Oct 11 2007, 12:40 AM
Sean|Nooby4life19
Oct 11 2007, 12:35 AM
Kiba
Oct 11 2007, 12:34 AM
Sean|Nooby4life19
Oct 10 2007, 11:59 PM
Wow, i've personally played a pretty long time on and off since dec 2001, like off the year 2003 and on 2004 etc, but i just really wanna state.

People say "make a barrow pure" and "Cool rune pure"

A pure is some one with higher HP than his combat basically, and has focused on some things, like strength & attack. But there are NOT rune pures, barrow, 30 def, 20 def pures. They aren't pures if they do that. People make others confused then the people they confused believe what ever the one person said.

But the only thing even close to being a pure is like a 1 def pure
There aren't rune , barrows etc.

End rant just wanted to say

This was moot as soon as RS2 was released.

But yeah in RSC, a person was "pure" by how high their hp was over their combat. This was pretty lame anyways because you could have 40 atk 45 str 25 defense and still be 39 combat with 40 hp, but it was a general idea.

When rs2 was made, IMO it helped the wild some but mostly ruined it.

RS2 fixed the bug in wild, that was generally known as "catching" an opponent. I liked RSC wild but that could just be because I was use to it. I think early RS2 was much more adaptive than RSC. If I had a timeframe in which I could say was the best, it would have been during the release of specials until mauls and whips were released.

Wild was perfect. Magic was still below average, but range and melee were well balanced. Range hit hard, but melee's had granite shield, bers/warrior helm, and rune, using either D long or D b-axe..with dagger (even though dagger was much weaker than it is now, it still had effect against low defense; dragonhide)

Range was effective even with one special, and melee still could pull some awesome combos and stay protected defensively too.

If you could implement mystic robes into this time frame, it would have been perfect.

And add catching =D

Catching was a pain in the ass. RSC gave a person no reason to train up magic. Implementing roots and effective godspells was more effective. A shame people were stuck with crappy mage gear until slayer was released, which got mages owned with maul specs and whips anyways.
jesus christ its a snail
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Zaru
Member Avatar
omg basedgod you can fuck my bitch basedgod

Kiba
Oct 11 2007, 12:44 AM
Topide
Oct 11 2007, 12:41 AM
Kiba
Oct 11 2007, 12:40 AM
Sean|Nooby4life19
Oct 11 2007, 12:35 AM
Kiba
Oct 11 2007, 12:34 AM
Sean|Nooby4life19
Oct 10 2007, 11:59 PM
Wow, i've personally played a pretty long time on and off since dec 2001, like off the year 2003 and on 2004 etc, but i just really wanna state.

People say "make a barrow pure" and "Cool rune pure"

A pure is some one with higher HP than his combat basically, and has focused on some things, like strength & attack. But there are NOT rune pures, barrow, 30 def, 20 def pures. They aren't pures if they do that. People make others confused then the people they confused believe what ever the one person said.

But the only thing even close to being a pure is like a 1 def pure
There aren't rune , barrows etc.

End rant just wanted to say

This was moot as soon as RS2 was released.

But yeah in RSC, a person was "pure" by how high their hp was over their combat. This was pretty lame anyways because you could have 40 atk 45 str 25 defense and still be 39 combat with 40 hp, but it was a general idea.

When rs2 was made, IMO it helped the wild some but mostly ruined it.

RS2 fixed the bug in wild, that was generally known as "catching" an opponent. I liked RSC wild but that could just be because I was use to it. I think early RS2 was much more adaptive than RSC. If I had a timeframe in which I could say was the best, it would have been during the release of specials until mauls and whips were released.

Wild was perfect. Magic was still below average, but range and melee were well balanced. Range hit hard, but melee's had granite shield, bers/warrior helm, and rune, using either D long or D b-axe..with dagger (even though dagger was much weaker than it is now, it still had effect against low defense; dragonhide)

Range was effective even with one special, and melee still could pull some awesome combos and stay protected defensively too.

If you could implement mystic robes into this time frame, it would have been perfect.

And add catching =D

Catching was a pain in the ass. RSC gave a person no reason to train up magic. Implementing roots and effective godspells was more effective. A shame people were stuck with crappy mage gear until slayer was released, which got mages owned with maul specs and whips anyways.

Meh, I guess you're right. Catching was essential though without magic in RSC, in my opinion.
[img]http://img594.imageshack.us/img594/8886/294500.jpg[/img]

In hidden words which lurk behind the veil
The coils of the serpent swallowing its tail


NHS Hail Victory
4-track Ladytron covers and vanished dreams
LOVE SLAVES OF SATAN TORTURED TO BLOOD-DRIPPING DEATH, OH MY
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Chill
Member Avatar
play it cool kiby

Topide
Oct 11 2007, 12:51 AM
Kiba
Oct 11 2007, 12:44 AM
Topide
Oct 11 2007, 12:41 AM
Kiba
Oct 11 2007, 12:40 AM
Sean|Nooby4life19
Oct 11 2007, 12:35 AM
Kiba
Oct 11 2007, 12:34 AM
Sean|Nooby4life19
Oct 10 2007, 11:59 PM
Wow, i've personally played a pretty long time on and off since dec 2001, like off the year 2003 and on 2004 etc, but i just really wanna state.

People say "make a barrow pure" and "Cool rune pure"

A pure is some one with higher HP than his combat basically, and has focused on some things, like strength & attack. But there are NOT rune pures, barrow, 30 def, 20 def pures. They aren't pures if they do that. People make others confused then the people they confused believe what ever the one person said.

But the only thing even close to being a pure is like a 1 def pure
There aren't rune , barrows etc.

End rant just wanted to say

This was moot as soon as RS2 was released.

But yeah in RSC, a person was "pure" by how high their hp was over their combat. This was pretty lame anyways because you could have 40 atk 45 str 25 defense and still be 39 combat with 40 hp, but it was a general idea.

When rs2 was made, IMO it helped the wild some but mostly ruined it.

RS2 fixed the bug in wild, that was generally known as "catching" an opponent. I liked RSC wild but that could just be because I was use to it. I think early RS2 was much more adaptive than RSC. If I had a timeframe in which I could say was the best, it would have been during the release of specials until mauls and whips were released.

Wild was perfect. Magic was still below average, but range and melee were well balanced. Range hit hard, but melee's had granite shield, bers/warrior helm, and rune, using either D long or D b-axe..with dagger (even though dagger was much weaker than it is now, it still had effect against low defense; dragonhide)

Range was effective even with one special, and melee still could pull some awesome combos and stay protected defensively too.

If you could implement mystic robes into this time frame, it would have been perfect.

And add catching =D

Catching was a pain in the ass. RSC gave a person no reason to train up magic. Implementing roots and effective godspells was more effective. A shame people were stuck with crappy mage gear until slayer was released, which got mages owned with maul specs and whips anyways.

Meh, I guess you're right. Catching was essential though without magic in RSC, in my opinion.

Well of course it was :P

RS2 there's no need for it now though. Thinking about 3 round fights in RS2 would be a bit tacky. Everyone would just run around as archers because you can hit the person even if they were running. Would be a lot easier than using melee to catch them.
jesus christ its a snail
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
i own n33bs
Member Avatar
Kay Kay Just Jay Is Gay

think there called "hybrids" now which is a gay name for pure
Posted Image
Posted Image
Remeber I_P00n_N33bs
Proud Ex TLP
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Pur3range
Member Avatar
Fuck You

Pisses me off when they diss my stats and say shit like "I can own you on my barrow pure"
Posted Image
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Tim
7-4

i can own you on my main lvl 88

Posted Image

I knew that you wouldn't change, but I bit my tongue and swore,
Resigned myself to carry on despite you.
But you would not match my stride and cried,
"Foul! Foul! How could you expect me to care about somebody else?"
And after all, who would expect anything else from you?


lmao wats up friend - SKOTTY
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Deleted User
Deleted User

It's because of all the new updates.. Barrows, defenders, gloves, torsoes.. You name it, you have to realize that it's not the same as it was and live with it lol..
Quote Post Goto Top
 
Tek
Member Avatar
shit dont get real, people do.

You act like everyone who plays RS will see this rant,
Posted Image
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
jeremy_w


The term Rune Pure comes from RSC, 45 defence and 30 defence and 20 defence would've been HP > Combat on RSC, shows what that 3 years of RSC has taught you.


Barrows pures are just complete and utter bullshit though, and I see where you're coming from.
Posted Image
It's teamballs otherwise you're gay
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Brendan_
Member Avatar
вяєиdαи™

jeremy_w
Oct 13 2007, 12:30 AM
The term Rune Pure comes from RSC, 45 defence and 30 defence and 20 defence would've been HP > Combat on RSC, shows what that 3 years of RSC has taught you.


Barrows pures are just complete and utter bullshit though, and I see where you're coming from.

I don't think fremmenik helms were out during RSC, no?

And actually, if you have 45 def, your HP is almost always lower than your combat, and I don't see any usefulness from 45 def at that stage of runescape anyways.


Long live #peaches || http://z8.invisionfree.com/Team_Peach/index.php

Posted Image
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
Go to Next Page
« Previous Topic · Rants · Next Topic »
Add Reply
  • Pages:
  • 1