Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
We hope you enjoy your visit.


You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Once you've registered and completed email validation, you'll need to reply to the thread in The Welcome mat before you gain full access to the site.


Join our community!


If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
Bosom Buddies
Topic Started: Apr 16 2009, 04:39 PM (1,460 Views)
Sun Eater
Member Avatar
Regular
[ *  *  * ]
Hey guys I have a question. Let's assume I set everything up for a Bosom Buddies multiple attack. After I cleared my opponents board, can I team-attack directly to my opponent, then use Bosom Buddies to ready them? Because as I recall, direct damage is considered to be breakthrough, and team attacks can't cause breakthrough. What's the ruling on this one?

[bite] [bite] [bite]
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
FHR-X
Member Avatar
Regular
[ *  *  * ]
Team Attack does not cause breakthrough except when team attacking a player directly.
This still counts as breakthrough damage.

So to answer your question. Yes you can. (And they will do breakthrough damage.)
Edited by FHR-X, Apr 16 2009, 05:29 PM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Shadowtrooper
Member Avatar
I Hate Rebel Scum!
[ *  *  *  *  * ]
FHR-X
Apr 16 2009, 05:27 PM
Team Attack does not cause breakthrough except when team attacking a player directly.
This still counts as breakthrough damage.

So to answer your question. Yes you can. (And they will do breakthrough damage.)
And that is why people hate the Busom Buddies deck so much.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
FHR-X
Member Avatar
Regular
[ *  *  * ]
Really? They Do?

Around here it's a good deck. But it's by no means broken. I suppose the metagame does differs from region to region though.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Shadowtrooper
Member Avatar
I Hate Rebel Scum!
[ *  *  *  *  * ]
Oh hell yeah it does. Round here people hate the deck like crazy but I think it's just cause I built the damn thing. Deck is not impossible to beat but its annoying to play against because once it gets started is like playing solitaire.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Canadian Bacon
Member Avatar
Senior Member
[ *  *  *  * ]
Do you have a decklist ST? I'm curious what it looks like.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
KardKrazy
Member Avatar
"'I've got a huge" Member
[ *  *  *  *  *  * ]
There are three versions:

Version 1:
Characters (21):
4 Moonstar, Danielle Moonstar
4 Aurora, Jeanne-Marie Beaubier
4 Cable, Soldier X
4 Deadpool, Independent Contractor
4 Vision, Earth-10101
1 Deadpool, Earth-5021

Plot Twists (35):
4 Black Box
4 Bosom Buddies
4 Techno-Organic Virus
4 We Can Rebuild Him
4 Call in a Favor
4 X-Men Don't Kill
3 Bodyslide
4 Losing the Argument
4 The Select, Team-Up

Equipment (4):
4 Psimitar

Version 2:
Characters (18):
4 Moonstar, Danielle Moonstar
4 Cable, Dayspring
2 Cable, Soldier X
4 Deadpool, Independent Contractor
4 Vision, Earth-10101

Plot Twists (41):
4 Black Box
4 Bosom Buddies
4 Techno-Organic Virus
4 We Can Rebuild Him
3 Call in a Favor
3 Heroes of Two Worlds
4 X-Men Don't Kill
3 Bodyslide
4 Losing the Argument
4 The Select, Team-Up
2 Have a Blast
2 Only Human

Locations (1):
1 The Peak

Version 3:
Characters (17):
4 Moonstar, Danielle Moonstar
4 Cable, Dayspring
1 Cable, Soldier X
4 Deadpool, Independent Contractor
4 Vision, Earth-10101

Plot Twists (41):
4 Black Box
4 Bosom Buddies
4 Techno-Organic Virus
4 We Can Rebuild Him
2 Call in a Favor
3 Heroes of Two Worlds
2 Pathetic Attempt
3 Bodyslide
4 Losing the Argument
4 The Select, Team-Up
1 Have a Blast
1 Only Human
3 Cutting Loose
1 For Great Justice!
1 The Stamford Incident

Locations (2):
2 The Peak

There you go Canadian. I am pretty sure one of these are the deck he is speaking of since he did an article on all three. Which one I am unsure=\.
later,
Kj
Edited by KardKrazy, Apr 16 2009, 11:46 PM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Shadowtrooper
Member Avatar
I Hate Rebel Scum!
[ *  *  *  *  * ]
Canadian Bacon
Apr 16 2009, 09:51 PM
Do you have a decklist ST? I'm curious what it looks like.
Sure do man. KK already posted them but for the whole process of how the deck evolved and why versions 1 and 2 are either obsolete or no longer optimal check out the article here:

http://forum.tcgplayer.com/blog.php?b=482
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Sun Eater
Member Avatar
Regular
[ *  *  * ]
Version 3 is really solid, though I admit, it does sometimes feel like playing solitaire, what with all the card drawing and tricks on Turn 4.

But when the engine gets going, it totally rocks. Props to Shadowtrooper!

[bite] [bite] [bite]
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Shadowtrooper
Member Avatar
I Hate Rebel Scum!
[ *  *  *  *  * ]
Sun Eater
Apr 17 2009, 12:30 AM
Version 3 is really solid, though I admit, it does sometimes feel like playing solitaire, what with all the card drawing and tricks on Turn 4.

But when the engine gets going, it totally rocks. Props to Shadowtrooper!

[bite] [bite] [bite]
Thanks. Yeah when I built the deck the first time it was actually to prove how broken Black Box was. It was actually the third infinite loop deck that was created with the card. The first one was a Runaways discard deck the second one was abusing 3 drop Tabitha for a crazy amount of burn and then there was my BB deck. No need for me to say what happened to Black Box after the mob got to see all 3 decks.

Like my article says the new bully really made all of us forget about the power of BB. I ended up tweaking the deck to kill Exiles and I think it does just that, so whatever happens after that and for whatever reasons other people use the deck is out of my control. [angel]
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
darkzepher
Member Avatar
Regular
[ *  *  * ]
Bacon I made a version of the deck I am missing body slides. My version does not win on 4 consistantly but it can go infinite on 6.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Shadowtrooper
Member Avatar
I Hate Rebel Scum!
[ *  *  *  *  * ]
darkzepher
Apr 17 2009, 02:33 AM
Bacon I made a version of the deck I am missing body slides. My version does not win on 4 consistantly but it can go infinite on 6.
Infinite on 6 even with the errata on Black Box? Oh you have to share the deck list and how it works.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
darkzepher
Member Avatar
Regular
[ *  *  * ]
i'll try to put the list up later today I have been tweaking it and it is mainly for casual play but you just use siphon energys to target a black box in your row and target siphon energy ect.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
vs_savant2
Member Avatar
Zen Master of the Versus Arts
[ *  *  *  *  * ]
darkzepher
Apr 17 2009, 11:00 AM
i'll try to put the list up later today I have been tweaking it and it is mainly for casual play but you just use siphon energys to target a black box in your row and target siphon energy ect.
My lord I think that works.

Play Siphon from your hand targeting Black Box in your row, Then shuffel Siphon and other cards back in. Draw the Siphon and repeat. Thats jenius with a j.

[coolguy]
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
KardKrazy
Member Avatar
"'I've got a huge" Member
[ *  *  *  *  *  * ]
If you want to get even nastier you could actually make this go off on Turn 4. Katrina Luisa Van Horne and Thunderbolts Mountain make it possible in Silver.
later,
Kj
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
Go to Next Page
« Previous Topic · Rules · Next Topic »
Add Reply

Marvel Comics Character Images, Character Names and Card Text Copyright 2009 Marvel Characters Ltd. and/or Upper Deck Entertainment, LLC. DC Comics Character Images, Character Names and Card Text Copyright 2009 DC Characters Ltd. and/or Upper Deck Entertainment, LLC.