Random WWE Posts

Welcome to World Wrestling Everything. We hope you enjoy your visit.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.

Join our community!

If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Pages:
1
…
132
133
134
…
465

Random WWE Posts

Topic Started: Oct 21 2013, 11:22:39 PM (30,752 Views)

pokajabba

Dec 30 2014, 03:24:47 AM Post #2641

World Wrestling Federation Original

Posts:: 54,787
Group:: Global Moderators
Member: #118
Joined:: Dec 14 2014

Union: Jerichoholic
2nd Avatar

As noted in the past, a match between Sting and Triple H is considered likely for WrestleMania 31, however recently, another match for Sting has been discussed internally.

The idea of a Sting vs. Seth Rollins match has reportedly been brought up recently, a match that seems like a long shot, but has been talked about.

It’s also worth noting that there has been some rumors going around that claim Rollins could be in the WWE World Heavyweight Championship picture soon. Obviously if that were to happen, the Rollins vs. Sting match would not.

Source: http://www.sescoops.com/details-another-possible-opponent-sting-seth-rollins-enter-title-picture/

Oh yes, it's true it's true!

Posted Image

TGM

Dec 30 2014, 03:29:19 AM Post #2642

Money in the Bank Briefcase Holder

Posts:: 13,176
Group:: Global Moderators
Member: #24
Joined:: Sep 9 2013

Union: #MasterOfTheRemote
2nd Avatar

If Sting must wrestle at Mania, I would greatly prefer Rollins as an opponent over the likes of Trips or Taker.

But only if Rollins wins.

#MasterOfTheRemote

This is my blog!

www.VelcroTheNinjaKat.com

pokajabba

Dec 30 2014, 03:29:57 AM Post #2643

World Wrestling Federation Original

Posts:: 54,787
Group:: Global Moderators
Member: #118
Joined:: Dec 14 2014

Union: Jerichoholic
2nd Avatar

Nick Hogan, announced over the weekend that his father will be training hip-hop artist Riff Raff to get into a pro wrestling ring in the near future.

I wonder how well this will turn out. :roll:

From Hulk Hogan's Twitter:

''Can't wait to start training with my new partner @JODYHiGHROLLER !!! Hulkamania is going NEON brother! HH''

Oh yes, it's true it's true!

Posted Image

T-Unit

Dec 30 2014, 03:36:14 AM Post #2644

TRANNY-UNIT

Posts:: 17,202
Group:: Superstars
Member: #112
Joined:: Sep 22 2014

Union: WWEv
2nd Avatar

TGM
Dec 30 2014, 03:29:19 AM
If Sting must wrestle at Mania, I would greatly prefer Rollins as an opponent over the likes of Trips or Taker.

But only if Rollins wins.

I'd rather it be Sting-Triple H over Sting-Rollins.

TGM

Dec 30 2014, 03:46:20 AM Post #2645

Money in the Bank Briefcase Holder

Posts:: 13,176
Group:: Global Moderators
Member: #24
Joined:: Sep 9 2013

Union: #MasterOfTheRemote
2nd Avatar

T-Unit
Dec 30 2014, 03:36:14 AM
TGM
Dec 30 2014, 03:29:19 AM
If Sting must wrestle at Mania, I would greatly prefer Rollins as an opponent over the likes of Trips or Taker.

But only if Rollins wins.
I'd rather it be Sting-Triple H over Sting-Rollins.

That's a full match wasted on two part timers, though, neither of whom get anything out of it. At least with Rollins in the match there's the potential for him to get put over and get a good rub from the whole ordeal.

#MasterOfTheRemote

This is my blog!

www.VelcroTheNinjaKat.com

T-Unit

Dec 30 2014, 03:55:21 AM Post #2646

TRANNY-UNIT

Posts:: 17,202
Group:: Superstars
Member: #112
Joined:: Sep 22 2014

Union: WWEv
2nd Avatar

TGM
Dec 30 2014, 03:46:20 AM
T-Unit
Dec 30 2014, 03:36:14 AM
TGM
Dec 30 2014, 03:29:19 AM
If Sting must wrestle at Mania, I would greatly prefer Rollins as an opponent over the likes of Trips or Taker.

But only if Rollins wins.
I'd rather it be Sting-Triple H over Sting-Rollins.
That's a full match wasted on two part timers, though, neither of whom get anything out of it. At least with Rollins in the match there's the potential for him to get put over and get a good rub from the whole ordeal.

Where's the rule in pro wrestling that states one wrestler has to get something out of the other by going over? HHH and Taker weren't getting anything out of the other in their last two Mania matches, they were just booked to put on a good show. I don't see why the same doesn't apply with Sting-HHH...

pokajabba

Dec 30 2014, 03:55:42 AM Post #2647

World Wrestling Federation Original

Posts:: 54,787
Group:: Global Moderators
Member: #118
Joined:: Dec 14 2014

Union: Jerichoholic
2nd Avatar

I agree with TGM's logic.

There's no point in wasting yet another Wrestlemania slot on part-timers for the billionth time.

Just let Sting go out in a way that pleases the fans -- where he finally gets his moment to shine on the grandest stage of them all, and at the same time puts over younger talent.

Oh yes, it's true it's true!

Posted Image

pokajabba

Dec 30 2014, 03:59:08 AM Post #2648

World Wrestling Federation Original

Posts:: 54,787
Group:: Global Moderators
Member: #118
Joined:: Dec 14 2014

Union: Jerichoholic
2nd Avatar

T-Unit
Dec 30 2014, 03:55:21 AM
Where's the rule in pro wrestling that states one wrestler has to get something out of the other by going over? HHH and Taker weren't getting anything out of the other in their last two Mania matches, they were just booked to put on a good show. I don't see why the same doesn't apply with Sting-HHH...

Because Taker-HHH built towards a huge finale and then betrayed the entire concept later on.

And if we keep allowing part-timers to steal the spotlight then it'll continue on for ever, and ever, and ever, and ever, and ever, and ever, and ever, and ever, and ever, and ever, and ever, and ever, and ever, and ever, and ever, and ever, and ever.

Are you beginning to understand the drift?

Oh yes, it's true it's true!

Posted Image

T-Unit

Dec 30 2014, 04:02:18 AM Post #2649

TRANNY-UNIT

Posts:: 17,202
Group:: Superstars
Member: #112
Joined:: Sep 22 2014

Union: WWEv
2nd Avatar

pokajabba
Dec 30 2014, 03:59:08 AM
T-Unit
Dec 30 2014, 03:55:21 AM
Where's the rule in pro wrestling that states one wrestler has to get something out of the other by going over? HHH and Taker weren't getting anything out of the other in their last two Mania matches, they were just booked to put on a good show. I don't see why the same doesn't apply with Sting-HHH...
Because Taker-HHH built towards a huge finale and then betrayed the entire concept later on.

And if we keep allowing part-timers to steal the spotlight then it'll continue on for ever, and ever, and ever, and ever, and ever, and ever, and ever, and ever, and ever, and ever, and ever, and ever, and ever, and ever, and ever, and ever, and ever.

Are you beginning to understand the drift?

I think it would make more sense to have Rollins go over active, full time wrestlers on the roster and winning championships to get over, not beating men in their 50's.

TGM

Dec 30 2014, 04:04:36 AM Post #2650

Money in the Bank Briefcase Holder

Posts:: 13,176
Group:: Global Moderators
Member: #24
Joined:: Sep 9 2013

Union: #MasterOfTheRemote
2nd Avatar

T-Unit
Dec 30 2014, 04:02:18 AM
pokajabba
Dec 30 2014, 03:59:08 AM
T-Unit
Dec 30 2014, 03:55:21 AM
Where's the rule in pro wrestling that states one wrestler has to get something out of the other by going over? HHH and Taker weren't getting anything out of the other in their last two Mania matches, they were just booked to put on a good show. I don't see why the same doesn't apply with Sting-HHH...
Because Taker-HHH built towards a huge finale and then betrayed the entire concept later on.

And if we keep allowing part-timers to steal the spotlight then it'll continue on for ever, and ever, and ever, and ever, and ever, and ever, and ever, and ever, and ever, and ever, and ever, and ever, and ever, and ever, and ever, and ever, and ever.

Are you beginning to understand the drift?
I think it would make more sense to have Rollins go over active, full time wrestlers on the roster and winning championships to get over, not beating men in their 50's.

I agree. That said, if we MUST see these 50 year old part timers wrestle, I'd far greatly prefer to see them put someone new over, rather than literally waste everybody's time, which Sting/Trips would be.

#MasterOfTheRemote

This is my blog!

www.VelcroTheNinjaKat.com

pokajabba

Dec 30 2014, 04:09:33 AM Post #2651

World Wrestling Federation Original

Posts:: 54,787
Group:: Global Moderators
Member: #118
Joined:: Dec 14 2014

Union: Jerichoholic
2nd Avatar

T-Unit
Dec 30 2014, 04:02:18 AM
I think it would make more sense to have Rollins go over active, full time wrestlers on the roster and winning championships to get over, not beating men in their 50's.

Sting is an exception to the rule. His presence in WWE is huge (probably just as significant in the wrestling world as witnessing Sonic on Nintendo in gaming).

I feel that Seth going over Sting would not only help launch his career to new heights, but it would also send Sting off with a bang.

Oh yes, it's true it's true!

Posted Image

T-Unit

Dec 30 2014, 04:09:55 AM Post #2652

TRANNY-UNIT

Posts:: 17,202
Group:: Superstars
Member: #112
Joined:: Sep 22 2014

Union: WWEv
2nd Avatar

TGM
Dec 30 2014, 04:04:36 AM
T-Unit
Dec 30 2014, 04:02:18 AM
pokajabba
Dec 30 2014, 03:59:08 AM
T-Unit
Dec 30 2014, 03:55:21 AM
Where's the rule in pro wrestling that states one wrestler has to get something out of the other by going over? HHH and Taker weren't getting anything out of the other in their last two Mania matches, they were just booked to put on a good show. I don't see why the same doesn't apply with Sting-HHH...
Because Taker-HHH built towards a huge finale and then betrayed the entire concept later on.

And if we keep allowing part-timers to steal the spotlight then it'll continue on for ever, and ever, and ever, and ever, and ever, and ever, and ever, and ever, and ever, and ever, and ever, and ever, and ever, and ever, and ever, and ever, and ever.

Are you beginning to understand the drift?
I think it would make more sense to have Rollins go over active, full time wrestlers on the roster and winning championships to get over, not beating men in their 50's.
I agree. That said, if we MUST see these 50 year old part timers wrestle, I'd far greatly prefer to see them put someone new over, rather than literally waste everybody's time, which Sting/Trips would be.

Well then prepare to either complain relentlessly or don't watch the match between Sting and Triple H because that's what is going to happen boy.

pokajabba

Dec 30 2014, 04:15:41 AM Post #2653

World Wrestling Federation Original

Posts:: 54,787
Group:: Global Moderators
Member: #118
Joined:: Dec 14 2014

Union: Jerichoholic
2nd Avatar

Great...

Oh yes, it's true it's true!

Posted Image

TGM

Dec 30 2014, 04:23:21 AM Post #2654

Money in the Bank Briefcase Holder

Posts:: 13,176
Group:: Global Moderators
Member: #24
Joined:: Sep 9 2013

Union: #MasterOfTheRemote
2nd Avatar

T-Unit
Dec 30 2014, 04:09:55 AM
TGM
Dec 30 2014, 04:04:36 AM
T-Unit
Dec 30 2014, 04:02:18 AM
pokajabba
Dec 30 2014, 03:59:08 AM
T-Unit
Dec 30 2014, 03:55:21 AM
Where's the rule in pro wrestling that states one wrestler has to get something out of the other by going over? HHH and Taker weren't getting anything out of the other in their last two Mania matches, they were just booked to put on a good show. I don't see why the same doesn't apply with Sting-HHH...
Because Taker-HHH built towards a huge finale and then betrayed the entire concept later on.

And if we keep allowing part-timers to steal the spotlight then it'll continue on for ever, and ever, and ever, and ever, and ever, and ever, and ever, and ever, and ever, and ever, and ever, and ever, and ever, and ever, and ever, and ever, and ever.

Are you beginning to understand the drift?
I think it would make more sense to have Rollins go over active, full time wrestlers on the roster and winning championships to get over, not beating men in their 50's.
I agree. That said, if we MUST see these 50 year old part timers wrestle, I'd far greatly prefer to see them put someone new over, rather than literally waste everybody's time, which Sting/Trips would be.
Well then prepare to either complain relentlessly or don't watch the match between Sting and Triple H because that's what is going to happen boy.

Oh trust me, I will be very vocal about it.

#MasterOfTheRemote

This is my blog!

www.VelcroTheNinjaKat.com

Pure

Dec 30 2014, 10:34:26 AM Post #2655

Brock Lesnar

Posts:: 5,091
Group:: Superstars
Member: #15
Joined:: Sep 7 2013

Union: WWEv

T-Unit

Dec 30 2014, 01:43:17 PM Post #2656

TRANNY-UNIT

Posts:: 17,202
Group:: Superstars
Member: #112
Joined:: Sep 22 2014

Union: WWEv
2nd Avatar

Now that DB's "healthy", I wonder how much change there will be in Bryan's wrestling.

Fromage

Dec 30 2014, 01:45:45 PM Post #2657

Wrestlemania 3 Main Eventer

Posts:: 33,456
Group:: Admins
Member: #14
Joined:: Sep 7 2013

T-Unit
Dec 30 2014, 01:43:17 PM
Now that DB's "healthy", I wonder how much change there will be in Bryan's wrestling.

Hopefully not too much. But if he stops with the diving headbutt, and the dives to the outside (which a bunch of other do already) I would be okay with that.

TheGM

Dec 30 2014, 03:21:31 PM Post #2658

Samoa Joe

Posts:: 562
Group:: Members
Member: #27
Joined:: Sep 9 2013

Union: WWEv

Fromage
Dec 30 2014, 01:45:45 PM
T-Unit
Dec 30 2014, 01:43:17 PM
Now that DB's "healthy", I wonder how much change there will be in Bryan's wrestling.
Hopefully not too much. But if he stops with the diving headbutt, and the dives to the outside (which a bunch of other do already) I would be okay with that.

But dives man, dives.

also needs more dives and superkicks.