| Welcome to World Wrestling Everything. We hope you enjoy your visit. You are currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| Random WWE Posts | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Oct 21 2013, 11:22:39 PM (30,863 Views) | |
| JML | Jan 2 2014, 12:58:51 AM Post #421 |
 
|
It has Kelly "dead inside" Kelly at #4. |
 |
 
|
| Deleted User | Jan 2 2014, 01:06:13 AM Post #422 |
|
Deleted User
|
:kobe2: |
|
|
|
| Pure | Jan 2 2014, 01:41:01 AM Post #423 |
Brock Lesnar
|
Edited by SAVE_US.F2K, Jan 3 2014, 01:50:40 AM.
|
| |
|
|
|
| Deleted User | Jan 2 2014, 09:01:37 AM Post #424 |
|
Deleted User
|
IMO, Jericho and RVD's Unforgiven 2001 encounter was their finest. Decent PPV, too. EDIT: Oh, and one of the rare occasions where you witness Jericho gain a minor injury. |
|
|
|
| Deleted User | Jan 2 2014, 09:56:30 AM Post #425 |
|
Deleted User
|
McCool in her teacher mode. mmm Torrie Wilson. Maria for #1 Liked Stacey more in her days in WCW as Miss Hancock. |
|
|
|
| TruthTellers | Jan 2 2014, 03:06:51 PM Post #426 |
Barry Horowitz
  ![]](http://z5.ifrm.com/static/1/pip_r.png)
|
There is no way that picture of McCool is real. I know this is going to sound so TruthTellers, but her breasts in that picture were 5 times their normal size from what I remember. Am I wrong about this? BTW, McCool was a very good women's wrestler and I'd much rather see her back in WWE than the Bella Twins. McCool seemed to be in WWE to entertain the fans with good Women's wrestling and storylines, whereas the Bellas are only their for themselves. |
|
I have fought some guys that weren't actually there and I beat them so bad they disappeared. -Roddy Piper | |
|
|
|
| TruthTellers | Jan 2 2014, 03:07:48 PM Post #427 |
|
Barry Horowitz
|
You've mentioned the "dead inside" look before with Eva Marie, but what exactly is the dead inside look? |
|
I have fought some guys that weren't actually there and I beat them so bad they disappeared. -Roddy Piper | |
|
|
|
| JML | Jan 2 2014, 03:34:08 PM Post #428 |
|
I don't know how to explain it. It's mostly the eyes.  She looks like a Terminator who was sent back in time to kill me
Honestly I thought the same thing when I saw that picture. That website in general just seems very second-rate and the writing is pretty bad too. I think all "hottest people" lists are really dumb. Edited by JML, Jan 2 2014, 03:43:41 PM.
|
|
|
|
| Deleted User | Jan 2 2014, 04:03:54 PM Post #429 |
|
Deleted User
|
I've always been rather partial to Miss Elizabeth. Somebody most people would not consider ''hot''. She was a good looking woman, sometimes genuinely beautiful (Though, slightly too skinny back in the day). Basically, I liked her because she rose above the mere ''Hurp durp, I want to bang you'' category. |
|
|
|
| JML | Jan 2 2014, 04:25:42 PM Post #430 |
|
This is part of why I think those types of lists are really dumb, everybody has their own preferences. If everybody on this forum made their own lists like that I doubt any two lists would look identical. And at least for a list of something like "favorite PPVs" you can have intelligent conversations about them by saying "I really liked this show because of this moment, this match, etc". With these "hottest divas evar!!" lists it mostly boils down to "idk, I think she's hot" |
|
|
|
| Deleted User | Jan 2 2014, 07:37:40 PM Post #431 |
|
Deleted User
|
I'm going to make a list of my top 10 favorite divas soon. |
|
|
|
| TruthTellers | Jan 2 2014, 11:22:57 PM Post #432 |
|
Barry Horowitz
|
I'm going to do the same and I'll add pictures. I'll keep it clean, I'm a changed man this year. |
|
I have fought some guys that weren't actually there and I beat them so bad they disappeared. -Roddy Piper | |
|
|
|
| Deleted User | Jan 2 2014, 11:33:12 PM Post #433 |
|
Deleted User
|
:kobe: |
|
|
|
| Deleted User | Jan 3 2014, 12:00:47 AM Post #434 |
|
Deleted User
|
''As previously reported, WWE was originally planning on a Brock Lesnar vs. Big Show match at the Royal Rumble pay-per-view. The idea came about when Show was feuding with The Authority. Apparently the plan was for Big Show to go through Randy Orton and The Authority, although he would never win the title, yet he would come out of the program as a solid main eventer. This would set up Show looking strong, making Lesnar look strong for a match against The Undertaker at WrestleMania XXX when he beat Show at the Rumble. Speaking of Taker vs. Lesnar, there appears to be some concern over a few different issues. One is the physical style that Lesnar has in recent years. Lesnar’s rough style, mixed with the bad physical shape Taker is in, is causing some concern. Another issue is that many, if not all of Taker’s opponents the last several years have secretly worked out their match with extensive practice before it actually took place. There is some concern within WWE as to whether or not Lesnar would be willing to put in that amount of time preparing for the match.'' Source: http://www.sescoops.com/huge-backstage-update-concern-wwe-lesnar-vs-taker-wmxxx/ Thoughts? |
|
|
|
| Pure | Jan 3 2014, 12:02:00 AM Post #435 |
|
Brock Lesnar
|
Taker supposedly wants to work with Bryan at WM30. |
|
| |
|
|
|
| Deleted User | Jan 3 2014, 12:04:41 AM Post #436 |
|
Deleted User
|
Sounds interesting. I would still like to know if any members here would be up for a Lesnar/Taker showdown at Wrestlemania. Personally, I would not. For reasons I've explained too many times. |
|
|
|
| Pure | Jan 3 2014, 12:11:02 AM Post #437 |
|
Brock Lesnar
|
I'm alright with it but not really crazy about the idea. |
|
| |
|
|
|
| kkirbyyi_ | Jan 3 2014, 01:48:41 AM Post #438 |
~Jung Nicholas 정니콜라스
|
Taker/Lesnar had a lot more appeal to me in 2011 & 2012 than it does now. I honestly feel like giving Triple H two shots in a row really hurt Taker's availability to entertain some fresh match-ups at Wrestlemania. This will likely be Taker's last match, and all we'll have to remember in the five years prior are two all-time classics with HBK, one forgettable and one solid match with Triple H respectively, and a great bout with CM Punk. On paper, that sounds pretty damn good, but now we have Brock Lesnar, Daniel Bryan, and John Cena all lined up as viable candidates to face Taker at Wrestlemania XXX. Instead of getting two of the three possible pairings, we're only going to get one. Given each opponent's ability to perform when it matters most, it's really disappointing to think about what we're missing.
Edited by kkirbyyi_, Jan 3 2014, 01:54:21 AM.
|
|
Ladies and Gentlemen. . . Can I have some decorum, please? I'm afraid I have some BAD NEWS! #BadNewsKirby 7.22.14 | |
|
|
|
| TruthTellers | Jan 3 2014, 01:51:06 AM Post #439 |
|
Barry Horowitz
|
I've been pro Taker-Lesnar since Lesnar came back in 2012, but on second thought, I don't want that anymore UNLESS it's a Lesnar victory. Lesnar doesn't put in enough time to be deserving of the win and him being a huge heel would probably create some good heat with both casual and hardcore fans, but Lesnar shouldn't face Taker because he isn't deserving of the honor and because he doesn't put in enough time. At this point, I honestly don't know who Taker should face at Mania. I just want to see something that's well built that starts being built the night of the Rumble with a Taker surprise entrance. Now, what I'd like to see is Taker get eliminated by Kane and then have Taker screw Orton out of the title at Elimination Chamber in return. Set up the Kane-Taker match at Mania and finish the saga between the two. Make it both Kane's and Taker's last match. OR seeing as how the recent rumor is Taker wants to "work with" Bryan, have it be a tag team match between Undertaker and Daniel Bryan vs Kane and Triple H and have Kane pin Bryan and scream, "YOU ARE THE WEAK LINK!!!" This breaks the streak, but Taker isn't actually pinned in the process, it moves Bryan into what should be a decent feud with his former tag team partner following Mania, raises Bryan's status by having him be Taker's tag partner, and maybe helps put Bryan over that much more. By the time Bryan's beat Kane fifty times, he can get a WWEWHC title shot again and we can have ourselves a "Summer of Bryan." This also sets up the inevitable Kane vs Undertaker match at WM31 and then that ends the saga. Either way, it really should be Kane who is Undertakers last opponent because it's a fitting end to the last vestiges of WWF from the Attitude Era. Kane vs Taker is the real "End of an Era" match, not HHH-Taker from WM28 because even then, I knew Trips wasn't going to hang it up. His ego wouldn't let him. |
|
I have fought some guys that weren't actually there and I beat them so bad they disappeared. -Roddy Piper | |
|
|
|
| TruthTellers | Jan 3 2014, 01:54:14 AM Post #440 |
|
Barry Horowitz
|
I guess that would then leave Cena to face Batista at Mania continuing their rivalry and Punk vs Orton for the title, which Randy wins back the night after Elimination Chamber after beating... Daniel Bryan again. So, then, I have Punk winning the Rumble this year. He's due to get back into the WWEWHC title picture. |
|
I have fought some guys that weren't actually there and I beat them so bad they disappeared. -Roddy Piper | |
|
|
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
|
|
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · World Wrestling Entertainment · Next Topic » |
12:40 PM Jul 13